Re: Compiling module descriptors is not reproducible?

2018-05-19 Thread Mark Raynsford
On 2018-05-19T12:26:55 +0100 Alan Bateman wrote: > > The requires table in the Module attribute can be used by compilers to > record version information about dependences. javac does record the > version information, I don't know if there is a way to disable that. In > any case, I assume your q

Re: Compiling module descriptors is not reproducible?

2018-05-19 Thread Remi Forax
- Mail original - > De: "Alan Bateman" > À: "org openjdk" , "jigsaw-dev" > > Envoyé: Samedi 19 Mai 2018 13:26:55 > Objet: Re: Compiling module descriptors is not reproducible? > On 19/05/2018 10:18, Mark Raynsford wrote: >> Hello! >> >> I've been interested for a while in making all of

Re: Compiling module descriptors is not reproducible?

2018-05-19 Thread Remi Forax
- Mail original - > De: "org openjdk" > À: "jigsaw-dev" > Envoyé: Samedi 19 Mai 2018 11:18:09 > Objet: Compiling module descriptors is not reproducible? > Hello! Hi Mark, > > I've been interested for a while in making all of my software builds > reproducible [0]. I don't think there's

Re: Compiling module descriptors is not reproducible?

2018-05-19 Thread Alan Bateman
On 19/05/2018 10:18, Mark Raynsford wrote: Hello! I've been interested for a while in making all of my software builds reproducible [0]. I don't think there's ever been any kind of written guarantee that the output of javac will be completely deterministic, but to date it seems like it actually

Compiling module descriptors is not reproducible?

2018-05-19 Thread Mark Raynsford
Hello! I've been interested for a while in making all of my software builds reproducible [0]. I don't think there's ever been any kind of written guarantee that the output of javac will be completely deterministic, but to date it seems like it actually has been. However, I was a bit disappointed t