Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk14/8225773/webrev.00/
jdeps --check throws NPE when the module descriptor has missing
dependences. This patch fixes jdeps --check option to report a module
with missing dependences as other jdeps options.
This patch applies on the top of the p
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk14/8229396/webrev.00/index.html
This fixes jdeps --generate-module-info option to read
a multi-release JAR with the version specified at --multi-release
option. Also it enhances jdeps to report missing dependences as
other options such as --list-deps
Hi Mandy,
Yes, but they create a member which is not accessible.
As far as I can see, all places where AccessibleObject.override is ever set
there is a check of the current caller with Reflection.getCallerClass().
/Kasper
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 19:25, Mandy Chung wrote:
>
> Have you looked at L
Have you looked at Lookup::revealDirect and MethodHandleInfo::reflectAs?
Mandy
On 1/8/20 5:49 AM, Kasper Nielsen wrote:
Sorry, I could have been a bit more specific. I meant something like
Method.setAccessible(Lookup, true)
I want to base an API on lookup objects. But I want to still support s
Sorry, I could have been a bit more specific. I meant something like
Method.setAccessible(Lookup, true)
I want to base an API on lookup objects. But I want to still support some use
cases where people rely on java.lang.reflect.Field|Constructor|Method.
Specifically, being able to create an Executa
see
https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/13/docs/api/java.base/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandles.html#privateLookupIn(java.lang.Class,java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.Lookup)
Rémi
- Mail original -
> De: "Kasper Nielsen"
> À: "jigsaw-dev"
> Envoyé: Mercredi 8 Janvier 2020 12:14:30
> Objet
Hi,
I'm trying to bridge some old code using java.lang.reflect and some new code
that uses Lookup objects. And I'm wondering if there is some way to make
a member accessible using a Lookup object? Or if open packages/modules via
module-info.java + member.setAccessible(true) is the only way?
Thank
