hanks,
Siba
-Original Message-
From: Wang Weijun
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 2:36 PM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo
Cc: Mandy Chung; Valerie Peng; jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net; OpenJDK
Subject: Re: [9] RFR:8130360: Add tests to verify 3rd party security providers
if they are in signed/unsigned modular
@openjdk.java.net; OpenJDK
Subject: Re: [9] RFR:8130360: Add tests to verify 3rd party security providers
if they are in signed/unsigned modular JARs
I have no more comment.
--Max
> On Jan 3, 2016, at 3:48 PM, Sibabrata Sahoo
> wrote:
>
> Updated the bug title and description.
>
&
ata Sahoo
> Cc: Mandy Chung; Valerie Peng; jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net; OpenJDK
> Subject: Re: [9] RFR:8130360: Add tests to verify 3rd party security
> providers if they are in signed/unsigned modular JARs
>
> Then you don't need to include the "signed/unsigned" words i
Updated the bug title and description.
Thanks,
Siba
-Original Message-
From: Wang Weijun
Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2016 1:02 PM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo
Cc: Mandy Chung; Valerie Peng; jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net; OpenJDK
Subject: Re: [9] RFR:8130360: Add tests to verify 3rd party security
Then you don't need to include the "signed/unsigned" words in the bug
description.
--Max
> On Jan 3, 2016, at 2:30 PM, Sibabrata Sahoo
> wrote:
>
> Hi Max,
>
> The test is for verifying 3rd party security provider in
> classpath/modulepath. I am using an empty provider to check, if the prov
nuary 02, 2016 3:11 PM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo
Cc: Mandy Chung; Valerie Peng; jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net; OpenJDK
Subject: Re: [9] RFR:8130360: Add tests to verify 3rd party security providers
if they are in signed/unsigned modular JARs
Looks better.
One question: the bug description mentions
> -Original Message-
> From: Wang Weijun
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 7:20 AM
> To: Sibabrata Sahoo
> Cc: Mandy Chung; Valerie Peng; jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net;
> security-...@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: [9] RFR:8130360: Add tests to verify 3rd party security
&
se TestNG framework.
>
> Thanks,
> Siba
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mandy Chung
> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 11:55 PM
> To: Sibabrata Sahoo
> Cc: Valerie Peng; jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net;
> security-...@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: [9] RFR:81
ibabrata Sahoo
> Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2015 1:34 AM
> To: Mandy Chung; Weijun Wang
> Cc: Valerie Peng; jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net; security-...@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: RE: [9] RFR:8130360: Add tests to verify 3rd party security
> providers if they are in signed/unsigned
; jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net; security-...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: RE: [9] RFR:8130360: Add tests to verify 3rd party security providers
if they are in signed/unsigned modular JARs
Hi Mandy/Max,
Please review the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asmotrak/siba/8130360/webrev.03/
&quo
er.
> - Sign jar functionality removed.
>
> Thanks,
> Siba
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Valerie Peng
> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 5:37 AM
> To: Sibabrata Sahoo
> Cc: jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net; security-...@openjdk.java.net; Alan
> Bateman
> Sub
njdk.java.net; security-...@openjdk.java.net; Alan Bateman
Subject: Re: [9] RFR:8130360: Add tests to verify 3rd party security providers
if they are in signed/unsigned modular JARs
Hi Siba,
Here are some nits:
I think it's somewhat misleading to use the term JCE here as what you are
testing he
sday, December 09, 2015 5:37 AM
> To: Sibabrata Sahoo
> Cc: jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net; security-...@openjdk.java.net; Alan Bateman
> Subject: Re: [9] RFR:8130360: Add tests to verify 3rd party security
> providers if they are in signed/unsigned modular JARs
>
> Hi Siba,
>
> Here
>> On 11/30/2015 6:47 AM, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
>>> I would like to know more about this. As far, I can see the
>>> "java.security" provider configuration available with JDK9, it holds
>>> provider names instead of provider class names. In that case how i
mber 08, 2015 4:46 AM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo
Cc: Alan Bateman; security-...@openjdk.java.net;
jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [9] RFR:8130360: Add tests to verify 3rd party security
providers if they are in signed/unsigned modular JARs
Siba,
I have just started to review this webrev and not
a Sahoo; security-...@openjdk.java.net;
jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [9] RFR:8130360: Add tests to verify 3rd party security
providers if they are in signed/unsigned modular JARs
On 30/11/2015 11:13, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
Here is the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asmotrak/siba/81303
k.java.net; jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [9] RFR:8130360: Add tests to verify 3rd party security providers
if they are in signed/unsigned modular JARs
Siba,
I have just started to review this webrev and not done yet.
As for your question, the java.security file in OpenJDK9 stil
aw-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [9] RFR:8130360: Add tests to verify 3rd party security providers
if they are in signed/unsigned modular JARs
On 30/11/2015 11:13, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
Here is the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asmotrak/siba/8130360/webrev.02/
I have one questio
nt: Monday, November 30, 2015 4:54 PM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo; security-...@openjdk.java.net; jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [9] RFR:8130360: Add tests to verify 3rd party security providers
if they are in signed/unsigned modular JARs
On 30/11/2015 11:13, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
> Here i
On 30/11/2015 11:13, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
Here is the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asmotrak/siba/8130360/webrev.02/
I have one question:
What should be the behavior when the older version of 3rd party JCE provider jar file(without service
descriptor "META-INF/services/*" & wor
ay, November 23, 2015 4:56 PM
> To: jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net; Sean Mullan
> Subject: [9] RFR:8130360: Add tests to verify 3rd party security providers if
> they are in signed/unsigned modular JARs
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Please help me with your review of this test
p; Sean Mullan
> Subject: [9] RFR:8130360: Add tests to verify 3rd party security providers if
> they are in signed/unsigned modular JARs
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Please help me with your review of this test for JBS:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-813
+HYPERLINK "mailto:security-...@openjdk.java.net"security-...@openjdk.java.net
From: Siba Sahoo
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 4:56 PM
To: jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net; jdk-security-dev_ww_grp; Sean Mullan
Subject: [9] RFR:8130360: Add tests to verify 3rd party security providers if
Hi,
Please help me with your review of this test for JBS:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130360,
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asmotrak/siba/8130360/webrev.01/
Description
Tests to verify 3rd party security providers if they are in signed/unsigned
modular JARs. The
24 matches
Mail list logo
