The changes to for JDK-8077360 [1] broke one of our test so it's failing
in jdk9/dev now.
As it happens, the test isn't really that useful anyway because the code
is exercised by many other tests. So I think we can just make is
miscellaneous test for now and replace when we do the next phase
> On 20 Apr 2016, at 16:37, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
>
> The changes to for JDK-8077360 [1] broke one of our test so it's failing in
> jdk9/dev now.
>
> As it happens, the test isn't really that useful anyway because the code is
> exercised by many other tests. So I think we can just make is mi
