On 29/10/2015 11:25, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
:
However, my feedback is that the -listmods option is confusing. An
option called "list" is something I expect to list all things, not to
be clever and only show some subset. At the very least, I consider it
vital for there to be a tool (preferab
On 29/10/2015 11:25, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
:
So, after about an hour yesterday, I did try that and it still didn't
work. That must have been because jmod doesn't work fully. I've tried
it now, and with -addmods it does find the modular jar file.
However, my feedback is that the -listmods opt
On 29 October 2015 at 13:18, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Bear in mind that the help/usage text of the jar.exe tool has not been
>> updated. As such, jmod.exe looks like its the only thing capable of
>> working with modules.
>>
> The jar tool is significantly enhancement to support modules so check out
On 29 Oct 2015, at 11:25, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>> ...
>
> Bear in mind that the help/usage text of the jar.exe tool has not been
> updated. As such, jmod.exe looks like its the only thing capable of
> working with modules.
Just on this specific point. Can you please try ‘jar —help’ from a
On 28 October 2015 at 23:59, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 28/10/2015 20:50, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>> Just to note that my experiments of the last 2 hours suggest that
>> "java -listmods" does not show user modules in its output, only JDK
>> modules:
>>java -mp jmods -listmods
>
> -listmods wil
On 10/28/2015 1:50 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Just to note that my experiments of the last 2 hours suggest that
"java -listmods" does not show user modules in its output, only JDK
modules:
java -listmods lists modules in the runtime image. There is no
distinction between "a user module in t
OK, I can see the version is added at packaging time. And I think I
see why, but still pondering it.
Just to note that my experiments of the last 2 hours suggest that
"java -listmods" does not show user modules in its output, only JDK
modules:
java -mp jmods -listmods
where "jmods" is a subdirec
On 28/10/2015 20:50, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
:
Just to note that my experiments of the last 2 hours suggest that
"java -listmods" does not show user modules in its output, only JDK
modules:
java -mp jmods -listmods
-listmods will list the names of the modules in the application's module
gr
On 10/28/2015 01:50 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Finally, I had my module-info.java in the wrong folder initially (at
the org.joda.convert package level, rather than the root). However, it
got picked up and compiled into the root of the output classes folder.
I guess this is expected, but I fo
On 10/28/2015 11:57 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
When running "java -listmods" I get outpuy including this:
java.base@9.0
java.compact1@9.0
java.compact2@9.0
java.compact3@9.0
java.compiler@9.0
java.corba@9.0
But when I look at the JDK source module-info.java file:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/j
I can confirm that the current EA build
1.9.0-ea-jigsaw-nightly-h3660-20151022-b86 allowed a successful build
using maven (with tests) of the OpenGamma test case, which is a step
forward from when I last tried it.
When running "java -listmods" I get outpuy including this:
java.base@9.0
java.compa
11 matches
Mail list logo