On Fri, 05 May 2017 12:36:38 +0200, Stephen Colebourne
wrote:
I think this design addresses some of Roberts's concern too. With this
plan, Maven Central would contain modules depending on automatic
modules, but the dependency names would be sufficiently stable for
this not to be the major iss
This is a proposal to mitigate some of the worst effects of automatic
modules. Partial modules remain the better solution.
We now have an agreed naming convention (reverse DNS), which is
something we haven't had before. This gives us relatively stable and
predictable names.
But we also know that
