Hi Mandy,
Yes, but they create a member which is not accessible.
As far as I can see, all places where AccessibleObject.override is ever set
there is a check of the current caller with Reflection.getCallerClass().
/Kasper
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 19:25, Mandy Chung wrote:
>
> Have you looked at L
nvoke/MethodHandles.html#privateLookupIn(java.lang.Class,java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.Lookup)
Rémi
- Mail original -
De: "Kasper Nielsen"
À: "jigsaw-dev"
Envoyé: Mercredi 8 Janvier 2020 12:14:30
Objet: Lookup objects and setAccessible
Hi,
I'm trying to bridge some old co
;
> - Mail original -
> > De: "Kasper Nielsen"
> > À: "jigsaw-dev"
> > Envoyé: Mercredi 8 Janvier 2020 12:14:30
> > Objet: Lookup objects and setAccessible
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to bridge some old code using java.lang.r
credi 8 Janvier 2020 12:14:30
> Objet: Lookup objects and setAccessible
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to bridge some old code using java.lang.reflect and some new code
> that uses Lookup objects. And I'm wondering if there is some way to make
> a member accessible using a Lookup o
Hi,
I'm trying to bridge some old code using java.lang.reflect and some new code
that uses Lookup objects. And I'm wondering if there is some way to make
a member accessible using a Lookup object? Or if open packages/modules via
module-info.java + member.setAccessible(true) is the only way?
Thank
