Re: RFR: 8154399, 8159096, export packages containing standard javadoc doclet

2016-06-21 Thread Erik Joelsson
Looks fine. /Erik On 2016-06-16 19:28, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: Please review this simple fix for two related aspects of the same problem: Export the "standard doclet" used by javadoc, such that it is possible to derive alternative doclets, either by delegation or subtyping. In JDK 9, javad

Re: RFR: 8154399, 8159096, export packages containing standard javadoc doclet

2016-06-17 Thread Alan Bateman
On 17/06/2016 03:28, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: Please review this simple fix for two related aspects of the same problem: Export the "standard doclet" used by javadoc, such that it is possible to derive alternative doclets, either by delegation or subtyping. In JDK 9, javadoc has a "new" stan

Re: RFR: 8154399, 8159096, export packages containing standard javadoc doclet

2016-06-16 Thread Mandy Chung
> On Jun 16, 2016, at 7:28 PM, Jonathan Gibbons > wrote: > > Please review this simple fix for two related aspects of the same problem: > > Export the "standard doclet" used by javadoc, such that it is possible to > derive alternative doclets, either by delegation or subtyping. > > In JDK 9,

RFR: 8154399, 8159096, export packages containing standard javadoc doclet

2016-06-16 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
Please review this simple fix for two related aspects of the same problem: Export the "standard doclet" used by javadoc, such that it is possible to derive alternative doclets, either by delegation or subtyping. In JDK 9, javadoc has a "new" standard doclet (JEP 221), but the old one remains