It would be useful for the jar tool to report the automatic module
name that would be used if a regular jar file was put on the
module path ( so there is an easy way for developers to
determine the derived name ).
One way to achieve this is to repurpose the somewhat
finger-some '--print-module-de
On 15/03/2017 14:21, Chris Hegarty wrote:
:
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8176772.00/
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176772
If findAll returns an empty set then the error.unable.derive.automodule
message might be more appropriate. Otherwise looks good to me.
> On 15 Mar 2017, at 14:42, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
> On 15/03/2017 14:21, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
>> :
>>
>> Webrev:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8176772.00/
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176772
>>
> If findAll returns an empty set then the error.unable.derive.au
On 15/03/2017 15:31, Chris Hegarty wrote:
:
That would be better. Updated in-place.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8176772.00/
Looks good.
> On Mar 15, 2017, at 8:31 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
>
>> On 15 Mar 2017, at 14:42, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>
>> On 15/03/2017 14:21, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>
>>> :
>>>
>>> Webrev:
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8176772.00/
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176772
>>
> On 15 Mar 2017, at 16:54, Mandy Chung wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 15, 2017, at 8:31 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 15 Mar 2017, at 14:42, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>>
>>> On 15/03/2017 14:21, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>>
:
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/81
> On Mar 15, 2017, at 10:12 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
>>
>> Is there any reason why this option does not print the synthesized
>> descriptor? I understand that the issue is specific to show the derived
>> module name. But it’d be nice for this option to print the descriptor
>> consistent
> On 15 Mar 2017, at 17:30, Mandy Chung wrote:
>
> ...
> provides and main class, if present.
>
> The modifier of ModuleDescriptor will have AUTOMATIC and so all packages are
> exported and open implicitly and not shown in the output which is okay.
This is a good idea. Here’s an example:
ja
On 16 Mar 2017, at 13:09, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
>> On 15 Mar 2017, at 17:30, Mandy Chung wrote:
>>
>> ...
>> provides and main class, if present.
>>
>> The modifier of ModuleDescriptor will have AUTOMATIC and so all packages are
>> exported and open implicitly and not shown in the output wh
> On Mar 16, 2017, at 6:09 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
> Updated webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8176772.01/
Looks good.
thanks
Mandy
10 matches
Mail list logo
