Re: RFR 8161102: Regression test for JDK-8161101 (Recursive update error when a SecurityManager references a permission defined in a non-privileged module)

I have not followed the discussion of the problem. But this test looks simple and fine to me. The test may be helpful to replay the issue. Better to add more comments in the test about what's the problem the test case cares about. Thanks, Xuelei On 7/11/2016 9:14 AM, Wang Weijun wrote: > Hi All

Re: RFR 8161102: Regression test for JDK-8161101 (Recursive update error when a SecurityManager references a permission defined in a non-privileged module)

Ok, that's simpler. Code and error added as a comment to JDK-8161101. I also changed the synopsis a little because error is different when run standalone. Thanks Max > On Jul 11, 2016, at 2:15 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: > > On 11/07/2016 02:14, Wang Weijun wrote: > >> Hi All >> >> I filed a bu

Re: RFR 8161102: Regression test for JDK-8161101 (Recursive update error when a SecurityManager references a permission defined in a non-privileged module)

On 11/07/2016 02:14, Wang Weijun wrote: Hi All I filed a bug [1] on my recent finding [2] of a bug in SecurityManager. While I cannot find a fix, I'm able to provide a regression test, Therefore I created a sub-task [2] for the test. Please take a review at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~we

RFR 8161102: Regression test for JDK-8161101 (Recursive update error when a SecurityManager references a permission defined in a non-privileged module)

Hi All I filed a bug [1] on my recent finding [2] of a bug in SecurityManager. While I cannot find a fix, I'm able to provide a regression test, Therefore I created a sub-task [2] for the test. Please take a review at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8161102/webrev.00/ Whoever is able to