If the spec is updated, i really want to get ride of ACC_STATIC_PHASE and uses
ACC_STATIC instead.
Renaming public to transitive was the right move but I think we go a little
over the top with static.
In the module-info, the Java syntax already uses static, i do not see a lot of
value to use a
On 30/01/2017 22:15, Remi Forax wrote:
Hi all,
chasing a bug on ASM, i've found that the module implementation in the JDK uses
the wrong values for ACC_TRANSITIVE and ACC_STATIC_PHASE,
in the spec [1],
0x0020 (ACC_TRANSITIVE)
0x0040 (ACC_STATIC_PHASE)
but in the implementation [2],
pub
Hi all,
chasing a bug on ASM, i've found that the module implementation in the JDK uses
the wrong values for ACC_TRANSITIVE and ACC_STATIC_PHASE,
in the spec [1],
0x0020 (ACC_TRANSITIVE)
0x0040 (ACC_STATIC_PHASE)
but in the implementation [2],
public static final int ACC_TRANSITIVE= 0x00
