[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-12223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Vincent Trumpff reopened ARROW-12223: ------------------------------------- Reopening as we still have difference between C++ and JavaScript unless I missed something? > ArrayData buffers are inconsistent accross implementations > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ARROW-12223 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-12223 > Project: Apache Arrow > Issue Type: Bug > Components: C++, JavaScript, Rust > Reporter: Vincent Trumpff > Priority: Major > > ArrayData implementations seems to share close structure fields accross > languages, but their usage is not consistent accross implementation. > > Example using ListArray's offsets buffer, in C++, Rust and JavaScript > implementation: > - C++: offset's buffer is the second buffer (validity bitmap is first > buffer, and buffers are laid in a type-dependant way) > https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc#L189 > - Rust: offset's buffer is the first buffer (validity bitmap is not part of > the collection, and buffers are laid in a type-dependant way) > https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/rust/arrow/src/array/array_list.rs#L235 > - JavaScript: offset's buffer is the first buffer (they have fixed position) > [https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/8e43f23dcc6a9e630516228f110c48b64d13cec6/js/src/data.ts#L125] > > Note that we have the same inconsistency for validity and data buffers. > > This is important in my project because I would like to transport buffers > list accross technologies, and ArrayData seemed the easiest structure to > transport. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)