[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-12223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Vincent Trumpff reopened ARROW-12223:
-------------------------------------

Reopening as we still have difference between C++ and JavaScript unless I 
missed something?

> ArrayData buffers are inconsistent accross implementations
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-12223
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-12223
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: C++, JavaScript, Rust
>            Reporter: Vincent Trumpff
>            Priority: Major
>
> ArrayData implementations seems to share close structure fields accross 
> languages, but their usage is not consistent accross implementation.
>  
> Example using ListArray's offsets buffer, in C++, Rust and JavaScript 
> implementation:
>  - C++: offset's buffer is the second buffer (validity bitmap is first 
> buffer, and buffers are laid in a type-dependant way) 
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc#L189
>  - Rust: offset's buffer is the first buffer (validity bitmap is not part of 
> the collection, and buffers are laid in a type-dependant way) 
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/rust/arrow/src/array/array_list.rs#L235
>  - JavaScript: offset's buffer is the first buffer (they have fixed position) 
> [https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/8e43f23dcc6a9e630516228f110c48b64d13cec6/js/src/data.ts#L125]
>  
> Note that we have the same inconsistency for validity and data buffers.
>  
> This is important in my project because I would like to transport buffers 
> list accross technologies, and ArrayData seemed the easiest structure to 
> transport.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to