[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-10889) The log cleaner is not working for topic partitions

2020-12-30 Thread Wenbing Shen (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17256867#comment-17256867 ] Wenbing Shen commented on KAFKA-10889: -- [~becket_qin] Hello,Qin,I found an internal theme that has

[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-10889) The log cleaner is not working for topic partitions

2020-12-30 Thread Wenbing Shen (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenbing Shen updated KAFKA-10889: - Attachment: 20201231-5.png 20201231-4.png 20201231-3.png

[GitHub] [kafka] itantiger commented on pull request #9790: Some parameters will be overwritten which was configured in consumer.config.

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
itantiger commented on pull request #9790: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9790#issuecomment-752873484 > I'd like to address the following priority rule in this PR :) > > 1. command-lind > 2. config file (consumer.config) > 3. default value Of course, I also

[GitHub] [kafka] chia7712 commented on pull request #9790: Some parameters will be overwritten which was configured in consumer.config.

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
chia7712 commented on pull request #9790: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9790#issuecomment-752873182 > Let me optimize it again and commit. Do you think it's necessary? I'd like to address the following priority rule in this PR :) 1. command-lind 2. config file

[GitHub] [kafka] itantiger commented on pull request #9790: Some parameters will be overwritten which was configured in consumer.config.

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
itantiger commented on pull request #9790: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9790#issuecomment-752872927 >>trunk? pardon me that I can't catch your point. > >That's my problem. hah > >>yep, the default value CAN overwrite the configs from either command-line or config

[GitHub] [kafka] itantiger removed a comment on pull request #9790: Some parameters will be overwritten which was configured in consumer.config.

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
itantiger removed a comment on pull request #9790: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9790#issuecomment-752872756 > >trunk? pardon me that I can't catch your point. > That's my problem. hah >> yep, the default value CAN overwrite the configs from either command-line or config

[GitHub] [kafka] itantiger commented on pull request #9790: Some parameters will be overwritten which was configured in consumer.config.

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
itantiger commented on pull request #9790: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9790#issuecomment-752872756 > >trunk? pardon me that I can't catch your point. > That's my problem. hah >> yep, the default value CAN overwrite the configs from either command-line or config file.

[GitHub] [kafka] chia7712 commented on pull request #9790: Some parameters will be overwritten which was configured in consumer.config.

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
chia7712 commented on pull request #9790: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9790#issuecomment-752870565 > I think the trunk also needs to be modified. trunk? pardon me that I can't catch your point. > Some config params would be overwritten by default value, WDYT?

[GitHub] [kafka] itantiger commented on pull request #9790: Some parameters will be overwritten which was configured in consumer.config.

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
itantiger commented on pull request #9790: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9790#issuecomment-752870058 > I guess you are talking about "title". yes, the title need to be revised. In addition, I think the trunk also needs to be modified. Some config params would be

[GitHub] [kafka] itantiger removed a comment on pull request #9790: Some parameters will be overwritten which was configured in consumer.config.

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
itantiger removed a comment on pull request #9790: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9790#issuecomment-752869488 > I guess you are talking about "title". yes, the title need to be revised. In addition, I think the trunk also needs to be modified. Some config params would be

[GitHub] [kafka] itantiger commented on pull request #9790: Some parameters will be overwritten which was configured in consumer.config.

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
itantiger commented on pull request #9790: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9790#issuecomment-752869488 > I guess you are talking about "title". yes, the title need to be revised. In addition, I think the trunk also needs to be modified. Some config params would be

[GitHub] [kafka] chia7712 commented on pull request #9790: Some parameters will be overwritten which was configured in consumer.config.

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
chia7712 commented on pull request #9790: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9790#issuecomment-752866046 > Do you think it needs to be revised? I guess you are talking about "title". yes, the title need to be revised.

[GitHub] [kafka] itantiger commented on pull request #9790: Some parameters will be overwritten which was configured in consumer.config.

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
itantiger commented on pull request #9790: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9790#issuecomment-752865674 Current priority, some config params would be overwritten by default value, Do you think it needs to be revised?

[GitHub] [kafka] itantiger commented on pull request #9790: Some parameters will be overwritten which was configured in consumer.config.

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
itantiger commented on pull request #9790: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9790#issuecomment-752864933 > > and then call `props.putIfAbsent` to set args from command-line only if the prop is nonexistent in config file. Hence, the priority of config file is higher than

[GitHub] [kafka] itantiger closed pull request #9790: Some parameters will be overwritten which was configured in consumer.config.

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
itantiger closed pull request #9790: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9790 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

[GitHub] [kafka] chia7712 commented on a change in pull request #9802: KAFKA-10894; Ensure PartitionInfo replicas are not null in client quota callback

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
chia7712 commented on a change in pull request #9802: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9802#discussion_r550409107 ## File path: core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/MetadataCache.scala ## @@ -266,8 +266,16 @@ class MetadataCache(brokerId: Int) extends Logging { def

[GitHub] [kafka] itantiger commented on pull request #9790: Some parameters will be overwritten which was configured in consumer.config.

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
itantiger commented on pull request #9790: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9790#issuecomment-752863384 > and then call `props.putIfAbsent` to set args from command-line only if the prop is nonexistent in config file. Hence, the priority of config file is higher than

[GitHub] [kafka] chia7712 commented on pull request #9790: Some parameters will be overwritten which was configured in consumer.config.

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
chia7712 commented on pull request #9790: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9790#issuecomment-752862049 > I think this priority is more better, and this PR is to do this. We load the props from config file first.

[GitHub] [kafka] showuon commented on pull request #9792: KAFKA-10870: handle REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS error in JoinGroup

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
showuon commented on pull request #9792: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9792#issuecomment-752861871 @hachikuji , I've updated in this commit: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9792/commits/62c3c76ddb8b8d1163281b837c2b273824a9e1ec. Please take a look. Thank you.

[GitHub] [kafka] showuon commented on a change in pull request #9792: KAFKA-10870: handle REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS error in JoinGroup

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
showuon commented on a change in pull request #9792: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9792#discussion_r550408203 ## File path: clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/internals/AbstractCoordinator.java ## @@ -658,6 +658,10 @@ public void

[GitHub] [kafka] showuon commented on a change in pull request #9792: KAFKA-10870: handle REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS error in JoinGroup

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
showuon commented on a change in pull request #9792: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9792#discussion_r550408165 ## File path: clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/internals/AbstractCoordinator.java ## @@ -658,6 +658,10 @@ public void

[GitHub] [kafka] itantiger commented on pull request #9790: Some parameters will be overwritten which was configured in consumer.config.

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
itantiger commented on pull request #9790: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9790#issuecomment-752860409 > 1. command-lind > 2. config file (consumer.config) > 3. default value I think this priority is more better, and this PR is to do this.

[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-7870) Error sending fetch request (sessionId=1578860481, epoch=INITIAL) to node 2: java.io.IOException: Connection to 2 was disconnected before the response was read.

2020-12-30 Thread Suo L. (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17256844#comment-17256844 ] Suo L. commented on KAFKA-7870: --- Recently I meet and fix a bug has similar exception like this. It was

[GitHub] [kafka] chia7712 commented on pull request #9790: Some parameters will be overwritten which was configured in consumer.config.

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
chia7712 commented on pull request #9790: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9790#issuecomment-752856869 @itantiger The priority of loading props is a bit chaos in this case. It seems to me the property of loading properties is shown below. 1. command-lind 1. config file

[GitHub] [kafka] chia7712 commented on pull request #9803: MINOR: Don't include stack trace for StateChangeFailedException

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
chia7712 commented on pull request #9803: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9803#issuecomment-752846372 > The stack trace for StateChangeFailedException is useless since the exception is just used to propagate an error message to the state change logger.

[GitHub] [kafka] dengziming commented on pull request #9649: MINOR: Combine repeated top-level error test in AlterIsrManagerTest

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
dengziming commented on pull request #9649: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9649#issuecomment-752820081 @chia7712 ,Thank you for your suggestion. In fact, I get the idea from `AlterIsrManagerTest.testPartitionErrors` which test 3 errors in a method, so I also merge the 3 top

[GitHub] [kafka] chia7712 commented on a change in pull request #8852: MINOR: code cleanup for Kafka Streams task classes

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
chia7712 commented on a change in pull request #8852: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8852#discussion_r550378570 ## File path: streams/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/processor/internals/Task.java ## @@ -116,89 +112,100 @@ public boolean

[GitHub] [kafka] hachikuji opened a new pull request #9804: MINOR: Propagate version correctly in `FetchSnapshotRequest` constructor

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
hachikuji opened a new pull request #9804: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9804 We missed this in the initial check-in of the `FetchSnapshot` API. We need to pass through the version to the super constructor. ### Committer Checklist (excluded from commit message) - [ ]

[GitHub] [kafka] hachikuji commented on pull request #9803: MINOR: Don't include stack trace for StateChangeFailedException

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
hachikuji commented on pull request #9803: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9803#issuecomment-752783760 @ijuma @chia7712 Thoughts on this PR? I was getting tired of seeing these useless traces in logging... This is

[GitHub] [kafka] hachikuji opened a new pull request #9803: MINOR: Don't include stack trace for StateChangeFailedException

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
hachikuji opened a new pull request #9803: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9803 The stack trace for `StateChangeFailedException` is useless since the exception is just used to propagate an error message to the state change logger. This patch eliminates the stack trace which

[GitHub] [kafka] jolshan commented on a change in pull request #9590: KAFKA-7556: KafkaConsumer.beginningOffsets does not return actual first offsets

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
jolshan commented on a change in pull request #9590: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9590#discussion_r550349828 ## File path: core/src/main/scala/kafka/log/Log.scala ## @@ -1306,7 +1309,7 @@ class Log(@volatile private var _dir: File, // in an unclean manner

[GitHub] [kafka] jolshan commented on a change in pull request #9590: KAFKA-7556: KafkaConsumer.beginningOffsets does not return actual first offsets

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
jolshan commented on a change in pull request #9590: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9590#discussion_r550349748 ## File path: core/src/main/scala/kafka/log/Log.scala ## @@ -1749,6 +1752,9 @@ class Log(@volatile private var _dir: File,

[GitHub] [kafka] jolshan commented on pull request #9590: KAFKA-7556: KafkaConsumer.beginningOffsets does not return actual first offsets

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
jolshan commented on pull request #9590: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9590#issuecomment-752782513 Updated to not clean past high watermark. If this should be its own ticket/PR, let me know. This is an automated

[GitHub] [kafka] hachikuji opened a new pull request #9802: KAFKA-10894; Ensure PartitionInfo replicas are not null in client quota callback

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
hachikuji opened a new pull request #9802: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9802 Previously offline replicas were included as `null` in the array of replicas in `PartitionInfo` when populated by the `MetadataCache` for the purpose of the client quota callback. This patch instead

[GitHub] [kafka] mjsax commented on a change in pull request #9801: MINOR: code cleanup for Kafka Streams task interface

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
mjsax commented on a change in pull request #9801: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9801#discussion_r550342976 ## File path: streams/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/processor/internals/Task.java ## @@ -98,17 +98,9 @@ public boolean isValidTransition(final

[GitHub] [kafka] mjsax commented on a change in pull request #9801: MINOR: code cleanup for Kafka Streams task interface

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
mjsax commented on a change in pull request #9801: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9801#discussion_r550342917 ## File path: streams/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/processor/internals/Task.java ## @@ -98,17 +98,9 @@ public boolean isValidTransition(final

[GitHub] [kafka] mjsax commented on a change in pull request #9801: MINOR: code cleanup for Kafka Streams task interface

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
mjsax commented on a change in pull request #9801: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9801#discussion_r550342638 ## File path: streams/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/processor/internals/AbstractTask.java ## @@ -124,11 +124,6 @@ public StateStore getStore(final

[GitHub] [kafka] mjsax opened a new pull request #9801: MINOR: code cleanup for Kafka Streams task interface

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
mjsax opened a new pull request #9801: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9801 Not functional change. Pure code cleanup. Call for review @vvcephei (cf. #8852 -- will split up the old PR into multiple smaller ones to simplify reviewing)

[GitHub] [kafka] mjsax commented on a change in pull request #8852: MINOR: code cleanup for Kafka Streams task classes

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
mjsax commented on a change in pull request #8852: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8852#discussion_r550337598 ## File path: streams/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/processor/internals/Task.java ## @@ -116,89 +112,100 @@ public boolean isValidTransition(final

[GitHub] [kafka] mjsax opened a new pull request #9800: KAFKA-9274: Fix commit-TimeoutException handling for EOS

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
mjsax opened a new pull request #9800: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9800 If EOS is enabled and the TX commit fails with a timeout, we should not process more messages (what is ok for non-EOS) because we don't really know the status of the TX. If the commit was indeed

[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-10894) Null replica nodes included in client quota callback Cluster

2020-12-30 Thread Jason Gustafson (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Gustafson updated KAFKA-10894: Description: I noticed an NPE in the client quota callback `updateClusterMetadata` due to

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-10894) Null replica nodes included in client quota callback Cluster

2020-12-30 Thread Jason Gustafson (Jira)
Jason Gustafson created KAFKA-10894: --- Summary: Null replica nodes included in client quota callback Cluster Key: KAFKA-10894 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10894 Project: Kafka

[GitHub] [kafka] mjsax commented on pull request #9107: KAFKA-5488: Add type-safe split() operator

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
mjsax commented on pull request #9107: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9107#issuecomment-752730961 Maybe I miss-understood you question. I thought the build fails because we are using some deprecated method -- for this case, we can make the build pass by suppressing the warning.

[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-10522) Duplicate detection and max.in.flight.requests.per.connection details

2020-12-30 Thread Chris Lambertus (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Lambertus updated KAFKA-10522: Reporter: Luigi Berrettini (was: Luigi Berrettini) > Duplicate detection and

[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-10523) Allow to provide producer ID

2020-12-30 Thread Chris Lambertus (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Lambertus updated KAFKA-10523: Reporter: Luigi Berrettini (was: Luigi Berrettini) > Allow to provide producer ID >

[GitHub] [kafka] mumrah commented on pull request #9799: QuotaRecord support in broker

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
mumrah commented on pull request #9799: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9799#issuecomment-752714250 Wrong remote/base branch This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

[GitHub] [kafka] mumrah closed pull request #9799: QuotaRecord support in broker

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
mumrah closed pull request #9799: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9799 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

[GitHub] [kafka] mumrah opened a new pull request #9799: QuotaRecord support in broker

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
mumrah opened a new pull request #9799: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9799 This PR adds support for handling QuotaRecord metadata in the broker. It also includes a new QuotaCache class for efficient lookups of the quotas.

[GitHub] [kafka] hachikuji commented on a change in pull request #9792: KAFKA-10870: handle REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS error in JoinGroup

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
hachikuji commented on a change in pull request #9792: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9792#discussion_r550271098 ## File path: clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/internals/AbstractCoordinator.java ## @@ -658,6 +658,10 @@ public void

[GitHub] [kafka] bertber commented on a change in pull request #9761: KAFKA-10768 Add a test for ByteBufferInputStream to ByteBufferLogInputStreamTest

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
bertber commented on a change in pull request #9761: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9761#discussion_r550262431 ## File path: clients/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/common/utils/ByteBufferInputStreamTest.java ## @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache

[GitHub] [kafka] chia7712 merged pull request #9784: MINOR: Fix connector startup error logging

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
chia7712 merged pull request #9784: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9784 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

[GitHub] [kafka] C0urante commented on pull request #9784: MINOR: Fix connector startup error logging

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
C0urante commented on pull request #9784: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9784#issuecomment-752650790 @chia7712 sure, here's an example: ``` [2020-12-30 09:56:35,481] ERROR [test-connector|worker] [Worker clientId=connect-1, groupId=connect-cluster] Failed to start

[GitHub] [kafka] chia7712 opened a new pull request #9798: MINOR: fix the soft link created by ducktape when running system test…

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
chia7712 opened a new pull request #9798: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9798 If we run system tests by container, the soft link created by ```ducktape``` references to path inside container. This PR adds a tiny function to correct soft link. ### Committer Checklist

[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-10891) The control plane needs to force the validation of requests from the controller

2020-12-30 Thread Wenbing Shen (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenbing Shen updated KAFKA-10891: - Component/s: (was: core) > The control plane needs to force the validation of requests from

[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-10891) The control plane needs to force the validation of requests from the controller

2020-12-30 Thread Wenbing Shen (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenbing Shen updated KAFKA-10891: - Component/s: network > The control plane needs to force the validation of requests from the >

[GitHub] [kafka] wenbingshen commented on pull request #9789: KAFKA-10891:The control plane needs to force the validation of requests from the controller

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
wenbingshen commented on pull request #9789: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9789#issuecomment-752579504 @showuon Thank you,Luke,I did accidentally use the formatting tool.I submitted the latest code.Thank you very much for your help.

[GitHub] [kafka] itantiger commented on a change in pull request #9790: Some parameters will be overwritten which was configured in consumer.config.

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
itantiger commented on a change in pull request #9790: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9790#discussion_r550151238 ## File path: core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/tools/ConsumerPerformanceTest.scala ## @@ -96,6 +97,28 @@ class ConsumerPerformanceTest {

[GitHub] [kafka] chia7712 commented on pull request #9784: MINOR: Fix connector startup error logging

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
chia7712 commented on pull request #9784: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9784#issuecomment-752402354 @C0urante Could you share the updated error message to me? This is an automated message from the Apache Git

[GitHub] [kafka] chia7712 commented on pull request #9525: KAFKA-10658 ErrantRecordReporter.report always return completed futur…

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
chia7712 commented on pull request #9525: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9525#issuecomment-752399751 @dajac Could you please take a look? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to

[GitHub] [kafka] chia7712 commented on pull request #9775: KAFKA-8460: reduce the record size and increase the delay time

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
chia7712 commented on pull request #9775: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9775#issuecomment-752396505 @showuon Is it a potential bug which can slowdown the consumer in this test case? Or this bug is caused by busy Jenkins?

[GitHub] [kafka] showuon commented on a change in pull request #9789: KAFKA-10891:The control plane needs to force the validation of requests from the controller

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
showuon commented on a change in pull request #9789: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9789#discussion_r550066877 ## File path: core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/network/SocketServerTest.scala ## @@ -1352,7 +1369,7 @@ class SocketServerTest { private def

[GitHub] [kafka] showuon commented on a change in pull request #9789: KAFKA-10891:The control plane needs to force the validation of requests from the controller

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
showuon commented on a change in pull request #9789: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9789#discussion_r550066382 ## File path: core/src/main/scala/kafka/network/SocketServer.scala ## @@ -1331,24 +1352,34 @@ object ConnectionQuotas { private case class

[GitHub] [kafka] showuon commented on a change in pull request #9789: KAFKA-10891:The control plane needs to force the validation of requests from the controller

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
showuon commented on a change in pull request #9789: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9789#discussion_r550066090 ## File path: core/src/main/scala/kafka/network/SocketServer.scala ## @@ -1089,9 +1107,9 @@ private[kafka] class Processor(val id: Int, } private

[GitHub] [kafka] showuon commented on a change in pull request #9789: KAFKA-10891:The control plane needs to force the validation of requests from the controller

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
showuon commented on a change in pull request #9789: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9789#discussion_r550065738 ## File path: core/src/main/scala/kafka/network/SocketServer.scala ## @@ -61,17 +61,17 @@ import scala.util.control.ControlThrowable * - data-plane :

[GitHub] [kafka] showuon commented on a change in pull request #9789: KAFKA-10891:The control plane needs to force the validation of requests from the controller

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
showuon commented on a change in pull request #9789: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9789#discussion_r550064975 ## File path: core/src/main/scala/kafka/network/SocketServer.scala ## @@ -988,60 +994,72 @@ private[kafka] class Processor(val id: Int, } } +

[GitHub] [kafka] inponomarev commented on pull request #9107: KAFKA-5488: Add type-safe split() operator

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
inponomarev commented on pull request #9107: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9107#issuecomment-752382595 As far as I can judge from the name, `@nowarn` is not for deprecation, but rather for a warning suppression 樂 apparently we need to mirror the changes in Java `KStream`

[GitHub] [kafka] chia7712 opened a new pull request #9797: KAFKA-10893 Increase target_messages_per_sec of ReplicaScaleTest to r…

2020-12-30 Thread GitBox
chia7712 opened a new pull request #9797: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9797 issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10893 The expected size is 340 and the throttle is 1 msg/sec so the expected minimal run time of one consumer/producer is about 6 mins.

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-10893) Increase target_messages_per_sec of ReplicaScaleTest to reduce the run time

2020-12-30 Thread Chia-Ping Tsai (Jira)
Chia-Ping Tsai created KAFKA-10893: -- Summary: Increase target_messages_per_sec of ReplicaScaleTest to reduce the run time Key: KAFKA-10893 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10893