RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-1033258042
@guozhangwang @showuon
In fact, I ran ConsumerBounceTest.testClose() several times locally
yesterday, and the testCase can all pass. I guess the jenkins
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-966737404
Hi @guozhangwang @showuon and @hachikuji
can you help to promote this PR?
Thanks.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-955202193
According to our previous discussion, I re-modified and submitted the code,
local debugging, regular expression subscription consumption, deleting or
creating a topic
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-948271872
Hi @guozhangwang Thank you for your reply，I agree with most of your points,
`KIP-580` is also a great optimization, I hope it can be completed as soon as
possible.
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-948271872
Hi @guozhangwang Thank you for your reply，I agree with most of your points,
`KIP-580` is also a great optimization, I hope it can be completed as soon as
possible.
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-948271872
Hi @guozhangwang Thank you for your reply，I agree with most of your points,
`KIP-580` is also a great optimization, I hope it can be completed as soon as
possible.
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-948271872
Hi @guozhangwang Thank you for your reply，I agree with most of your points,
`KIP-580` is also a great optimization, I hope it can be completed as soon as
possible.
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-948271872
Hi @guozhangwang Thank you for your reply，I agree with most of your points,
`KIP-580` is also a great optimization, I hope it can be completed as soon as
possible.
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-948271872
Hi @guozhangwang Thank you for your reply，I agree with most of your points,
`KIP-580` is also a great optimization, I hope it can be completed as soon as
possible.
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-948271872
Hi @guozhangwang Thank you for your reply，I agree with most of your points,
`KIP-580` is also a great optimization, I hope it can be completed as soon as
possible.
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-948271872
Hi @guozhangwang ，I agree with most of your points, `KIP-580` is also a
great optimization, I hope it can be completed as soon as possible.
But I still suggest that
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-948271872
Hi @guozhangwang ，I agree with most of your points, `KIP-580` is also a
great optimization, I hope it can be completed as soon as possible.
But I still suggest that
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-948271872
Hi @guozhangwang ，I agree with most of your points, `KIP-580` is also a
great optimization, I hope it can be completed as soon as possible.
But I still suggest that
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-948271872
Hi @guozhangwang ，I agree with most of your points, `KIP-580` is also a
great optimization, I hope it can be completed as soon as possible.
But I still suggest that
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-948271872
Hi @guozhangwang ，I agree with most of your points, `KIP-580` is also a
great optimization, I hope it can be completed as soon as possible.
But I still suggest that
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-948271872
Hi @guozhangwang ，I agree with most of your points, `KIP-580` is also a
great optimization, I hope it can be completed as soon as possible.
But I still suggest that
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-948271872
Hi @guozhangwang ，I agree with most of your points, `KIP-580` is also a
great optimization, I hope it can be completed as soon as possible.
But I still suggest that
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-942858528
@guozhangwang
Thank you for your reply
1. I agree that deleting the poll(long) method will make the code changes
easier, but this cannot solve the root cause,
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-942858528
@guozhangwang
Thank you for your reply
1. I agree that deleting the poll(long) method will make the code changes
easier, but this cannot solve the root cause,
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-942858528
@guozhangwang
Thank you for your reply
1. I agree that deleting the poll(long) method will make the code changes
easier, but this cannot solve the root cause,
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-942858528
@guozhangwang
Thank you for your reply
1. I agree that deleting the poll(long) method will make the code changes
easier, but this cannot solve the root cause,
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-942858528
@guozhangwang
Thank you for your reply
1. I agree that deleting the poll(long) method will make the code changes
easier, but this cannot solve the root cause,
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-942858528
@guozhangwang
Thank you for your reply
1. I agree that deleting the poll(long) method will make the code changes
easier, but this cannot solve the root cause,
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-942858528
@guozhangwang
Thank you for your reply
1. I agree that deleting the poll(long) method will make the code changes
easier, but this cannot solve the root cause,
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-942858528
@guozhangwang
Thank you for your reply
1. I agree that deleting the poll(long) method will make the code changes
easier, but this cannot solve the root cause,
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-942858528
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-942858528
@guozhangwang
Thank you for your reply
1. I agree that deleting the poll(long) method will make the code changes
easier, but this cannot solve the root cause,
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-942212413
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-942212413
@guozhangwang
To add, I think it is necessary to automatically clean up non-existent
offsets in the `onJoinPrepare` method
We now agree that offsetCommitTimer
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-942212413
@guozhangwang
To add, I think it is necessary to automatically clean up non-existent
offsets in the `onJoinPrepare` method
We now agree that offsetCommitTimer
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-942212413
@guozhangwang
To add, I think it is necessary to automatically clean up non-existent
offsets in the `onJoinPrepare` method
We now agree that offsetCommitTimer
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-942212413
@guozhangwang
To add, I think it is necessary to automatically clean up non-existent
offsets in the `onJoinPrepare` method
We now agree that offsetCommitTimer
RivenSun2 edited a comment on pull request #11340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11340#issuecomment-942212413
@guozhangwang
To add, I think it is necessary to automatically clean up non-existent
offsets in the `onJoinPrepare` method
We now agree that offsetCommitTimer
33 matches
Mail list logo
