wolfchimneyrock commented on PR #14635:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14635#issuecomment-1783465122
> @wolfchimneyrock Thanks again for the PR. We verified and your suggestion
makes sense. I have two asks:
>
> 1. Could you please file a bug and use the the jira id in the
dajac commented on PR #14635:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14635#issuecomment-1783402130
@wolfchimneyrock Thanks again for the PR. We verified and your suggestion
makes sense. I have two asks:
1) Could you please file a bug and use the the jira id in the PR?
2) Would it
dajac commented on PR #14635:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14635#issuecomment-1781346471
Thanks @wolfchimneyrock. We will take a look into it.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
wolfchimneyrock commented on PR #14635:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14635#issuecomment-1779515287
Here is a broker trace:
```
[2023-10-24 01:17:17,214] ERROR [KafkaApi-28598] Unexpected error handling
request RequestHeader(apiKey=LEAVE_GROUP, apiVersion=1,
wolfchimneyrock commented on PR #14635:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14635#issuecomment-1779439685
I'm not sure I can elaborate on what the underlying error response that
would have been sent with the LeaveGroup is, since the current code raises
that exception without
wolfchimneyrock commented on PR #14635:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14635#issuecomment-1779425711
> @wolfchimneyrock Thanks for the PR. I am not to fully understand the issue
yet. Could you please elaborate a bit more about the condition leading to it?
there is more
dajac commented on PR #14635:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14635#issuecomment-1779417281
@wolfchimneyrock Thanks for the PR. I am not to fully understand the issue
yet. Could you please elaborate a bit more about the condition leading to it?
--
This is an automated message
wolfchimneyrock opened a new pull request, #14635:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14635
KIP-848 introduced this check, but we have seen since upgrading to broker
3.4 with both Sarama and Librdkafka clients when issuing LeaveGroup and getting
an error, the single member gets lost