[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17794854#comment-17794854
]
Waleed Fateem commented on KAFKA-10457:
---
[~sagarrao] we ran into this issue recently. In our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17746881#comment-17746881
]
Sagar Rao commented on KAFKA-10457:
---
Thanks Yash. Yeah probably due to the workaround it hasn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17746865#comment-17746865
]
Yash Mayya commented on KAFKA-10457:
If we want to add a new Connect schema type to accommodate big
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17746198#comment-17746198
]
Sagar Rao commented on KAFKA-10457:
---
[~yash.mayya], IIRC, you had worked on an issue related to data
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17438256#comment-17438256
]
Arjun Satish commented on KAFKA-10457:
--
looks like we would need a new [data
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17211260#comment-17211260
]
Bill Bejeck commented on KAFKA-10457:
-
Since this is not a blocker, as part of the 2.7.0 release
