Kirk True created KAFKA-16899:
---------------------------------

             Summary: Rename MembershipManagerImpl's rebalanceTimeoutMs for 
clarity
                 Key: KAFKA-16899
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16899
             Project: Kafka
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: clients, consumer
    Affects Versions: 3.8.0
            Reporter: Kirk True
             Fix For: 4.0.0


The naming of {{{}MembershipManagerImpl{}}}'s {{rebalanceTimeoutMs}} is a 
little confusing.

Ultimately the broker enforces the rebalance process' timeout, not the client. 
It's therefore a little misleading to use {{rebalanceTimeoutMs}} as the name of 
a variable that only handles the client's commit portion of the process. It is 
used in {{MembershipManagerImpl}} as a means to limit the client's efforts in 
the case where it is repeatedly trying to commit but failing.

A suggested name change was {{{}commitTimeoutDuringReconciliation{}}}.

It is not clear to me that simply changing the name from {{rebalanceTimeoutMs}} 
to {{commitTimeoutDuringReconciliation}} is sufficient. When a caller 
instantiates a  {{{}MembershipManagerImpl{}}}, it is passing in a variable 
named {{rebalanceTimeoutMs}} that ultimately comes from the {{ClientConfig}} 
object. I can imagine it being a little confusing that a value for 
{{rebalanceTimeoutMs}} is passed in, but then really only used as the value for 
{{commitTimeoutDuringReconciliation}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to