[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Manikumar updated KAFKA-8061:
-----------------------------
    Description: 
In KAFKA-5503, we have added a check 
(https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/5881) for `running` flag in the loop 
inside maybeWaitForProducerId.  This is to handle concurrent call to Sender 
close(), while we attempt to get the ProducerId.

This created a corner case where sender thread gets blocked, if we had 
concurrent producerId reset and shutdown call. The proposed fix is to check the 
forceClose flag in the loop inside maybeWaitForProducerId.

 

 

  was:
In KAFKA-5503, we have added a check 
(https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/5881) for `running` flag in the loop 
inside maybeWaitForProducerId.  This is to avoid blocking sender thread 
shutdown call, while we attempt to get the ProducerId.

This created a corner case where sender thread gets blocked, if we had 
concurrent producerId reset and shutdown call. The proposed fix is to check the 
forceClose flag in the loop inside maybeWaitForProducerId.

 

 


> Use forceClose flag to check in the loop inside maybeWaitForProducerId.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-8061
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8061
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.1
>            Reporter: Manikumar
>            Assignee: Manikumar
>            Priority: Major
>
> In KAFKA-5503, we have added a check 
> (https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/5881) for `running` flag in the loop 
> inside maybeWaitForProducerId.  This is to handle concurrent call to Sender 
> close(), while we attempt to get the ProducerId.
> This created a corner case where sender thread gets blocked, if we had 
> concurrent producerId reset and shutdown call. The proposed fix is to check 
> the forceClose flag in the loop inside maybeWaitForProducerId.
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to