Oops!
Thanks for the info.
On 24/09/2009, Milamber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Small patch (xml-apis version 1.3.04) :
> ###
> Index: /eclipse.classpath
> ===
> --- /eclipse.classpath(revision 818617)
> +++ /eclipse.classpath(w
Author: sebb
Date: Thu Sep 24 23:56:20 2009
New Revision: 818668
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=818668&view=rev
Log:
Correct version of xml-apis
Modified:
jakarta/jmeter/trunk/eclipse.classpath
Modified: jakarta/jmeter/trunk/eclipse.classpath
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jakarta
Hello,
Small patch (xml-apis version 1.3.04) :
###
Index: /eclipse.classpath
===
--- /eclipse.classpath(revision 818617)
+++ /eclipse.classpath(working copy)
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
-
+
###
L
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47865
--- Comment #5 from Jakub 2009-09-24 14:13:31 PDT ---
I think memory is not a problem and divide the response time by 10 will
decrease performance (better use 8 or 16 then divide will be faster). In my
case it is important to know if the re
Author: sebb
Date: Thu Sep 24 21:00:01 2009
New Revision: 818624
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=818624&view=rev
Log:
Bug 47899 - NullPointerExceptions in ReceiveSubscriber constructor
Modified:
jakarta/jmeter/trunk/src/protocol/jms/org/apache/jmeter/protocol/jms/client/ReceiveSubscri
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47899
Hiskill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
On 24/09/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:38 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 22/09/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> >> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 9:19 AM, wrote:
> >> > Author: sebb
> >> > Date: Sat Sep 19 13:19:26 2009
> >> > New Revision: 816920
> >> >
> >> > URL: http://sv
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:38 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 22/09/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 9:19 AM, wrote:
>> > Author: sebb
>> > Date: Sat Sep 19 13:19:26 2009
>> > New Revision: 816920
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=816920&view=rev
>> > Log:
>> > Dro
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47865
--- Comment #4 from Sebb 2009-09-24 12:42:28 PDT ---
Thanks. Given that these calculations are all done on response time
(milliseconds), I agree that the limitation is not likely to cause a problem.
BTW, I just realised that one could save
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47865
Jakub changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #3 from Jakub 2009-09-24
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47865
Sebb changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #2 from Sebb 2009-09-
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47870
Sebb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hiki...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Sebb
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47899
Sebb changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47900
Summary: Subscriber ThreadGroup won't stop
Product: JMeter
Version: 2.3.4
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Com
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47899
Summary: NullPointerExceptions in ReceiveSubscriber constructor
Product: JMeter
Version: 2.3.4
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Pr
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project jakarta-jmeter-svn has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
16 matches
Mail list logo
