Final notice: The existing development mailing lists for Jakarta
subprojects (BCEL, BSF, Cactus, ECS, JCS, JMeter, ORO, Regexp and
retired subproject Slide) are merging tomorrow, April 19th.
Two new lists will be created, one for development discussions and
another for notifications (such as SVN,
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:09 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Fri Jan 29 15:09:58 2010
New Revision: 904514
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=904514view=rev
Log:
Prevent NPE in askThreadsToStop()
Modified:
The existing development mailing lists for Jakarta subprojects (BCEL,
BSF, Cactus, ECS, JCS, JMeter, ORO, Regexp and retired subproject
Slide) are merging.
Two new lists will be soon be created, one for development discussions
and another for notifications (such as SVN, Bugzilla, JIRA, Gump).
[Relaying result to all lists]
The vote to merge dev lists at Jakarta has passed with the following
binding votes cast:
5 +1s:
Felipe Leme
Daniel Savarese
Vadim Gritsenko
Rahul Akolkar
Stephen Colebourne
2 +0s:
Sebastian Bazley
Rony Flatscher
2 -1s:
Thomas Vandahl
Torsten
[Suggestion is to please reply to the gene...@jakarta list only]
This is a vote to consolidate the development lists at Jakarta into
one development and one notifications list. For background including
timing, anticipated benefits and some discussion, see proposal [1]
thread.
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
[Out of necessity, this is heavily cross-posted. Suggestion is to send
any replies to the gene...@jakarta list only to keep any discussion in
one place.]
We currently have 8 active development lists at Jakarta, each devoted
to a subproject. I've been subscribed to all for a while and based on
my
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:38 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/09/2009, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 9:19 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Sat Sep 19 13:19:26 2009
New Revision: 816920
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 9:19 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Sat Sep 19 13:19:26 2009
New Revision: 816920
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=816920view=rev
Log:
Drop jars that are downloadable elsewhere
snip/
Yes please, thanks :-)
-Rahul
Removed:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:44 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Tue Aug 18 12:44:22 2009
New Revision: 805391
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=805391view=rev
Log:
Remove some JDK 1.3 work-rounds
Modified:
Do we need to have Javadocs in SVN? They should be reproducible from
source? Anyway, 145 or 243 part commits are hard to follow ;-)
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On 11/28/07, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/11/2007, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
As a separate thought, over in Commons we've mostly gone from this
style to producing final / formal / correctly version numbered
artifacts, kept low key (put in the RM's ~, no mention
On 11/27/07, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
I'll proceed with cutting a formal 2.3.1 release (same content,
updated tag release id) shortly. [I assume it does not need another
VOTE thread?]
snap/
If you rebuild, then its best to have another vote. IIRC, you did that for v2.3.
As a
+1
Nits:
* Expected the source distro to just build (setup is odd, as Hen has
commented in more detail)
* Jar file names are odd (for example, IMO,
apache-jmeter-core-n.n.jar is better than ApacheJMeter_core.jar)
* README file, licensing and legal issues section, third list item is
13 matches
Mail list logo
