OK. I'm doing that.
I will also try to devise some easy-to-reproduce test that we can use
for comparison.
En/na peter lin ha escrit:
i like the idea of an iterator, since that is how we use it anyways :)
peter
Jordi Salvat i Alabart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
En/na BAZLEY, Sebastian ha esc
i like the idea of an iterator, since that is how we use it anyways :)
peter
Jordi Salvat i Alabart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
En/na BAZLEY, Sebastian ha escrit:
> Oops. The parser selection property I introduced does not extend well.
You're right. I have no shame.
> I propose changing t
En/na BAZLEY, Sebastian ha escrit:
Oops. The parser selection property I introduced does not extend well.
You're right. I have no shame.
I propose changing the property to something like:
jmeter.html.parser=
Sounds like a good option.
In the short-term, I suggest hard-coding the class nam
Likewise, I favour supporting multiple parsers.
Oops. The parser selection property I introduced does not extend well.
I should really have used a multi-valued property to define the parser type,
rather than using a boolean.
I propose changing the property to something like:
jmeter.html.pars
