Remote Thread Naming and other suggestions

2005-03-24 Thread Buechi Martin
All, To me it seems unfortunate that when multiple remote_hosts are used, there are multiple threads with the same thread names in the XML output. This makes the output less useful. Would it be possible to add the IP address (InetAddress.getLocalHost()) of the host at the end of the thread name

Re: jmeter code coverage

2005-03-24 Thread Peter Lin
I may be brain dead, but by coverage tool, do you mean source code anaylsis and statistics? jmeter is a stress testing, functional testing tool. Not a code analysis tool. google for the appropriate tool to do code analysis. peter On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:44:34 -0500, K, Sandeep Reddy <[EMAIL PROT

RE: jmeter code coverage

2005-03-24 Thread K, Sandeep Reddy
I want some thing like a code coverage tool which can get the code covered by jmeter Regards sandy -Original Message- From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 9:03 PM To: JMeter Users List Subject: Re: jmeter code coverage by covered, what do you mean? p

Re: jmeter code coverage

2005-03-24 Thread Peter Lin
by covered, what do you mean? peter On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:13:37 -0500, K, Sandeep Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to know how much code is covered by using jmeter. If any one > has tried this and has examples over these lines please forward them. > > Any he

jmeter code coverage

2005-03-24 Thread K, Sandeep Reddy
Hi all, I want to know how much code is covered by using jmeter. If any one has tried this and has examples over these lines please forward them. Any help will be very much appreciated. Thanks, sandy

RE: User Parameters for UserId & Password

2005-03-24 Thread Michael Stover
It depends on how much you want to change. If there are different sets of values you wish to use for different users, you can keep a group of values together using the User Parameters Pre-Processor. You can also use the new CSV configuration element (new in HEAD - nightly builds) to group togethe

HTTPS trustmanagers and hostnameVerifier not initialised properly in HTTPSampler

2005-03-24 Thread Pierre A. Damas
Hi, I want to connect to a site where I know that the site name is different than the name in the certificate (I know it is bad, but it is so ;-) ) My connection is refused by Java since the hostname verifier is not properly set. In fact, the JsseSSLManager properly initialises the context with

Re: User ID generation

2005-03-24 Thread sebb
Functions are not recognised in all components. Where have you placed the function call? Also, remove the trailing comma. The variable name can also be removed unless you want to re-use the value elsewhere. S. On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:04:53 +0530, Shaik Afgal Bhasha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: HTTP Proxy Grouping Timer

2005-03-24 Thread sebb
Yes - check jmeter.properties for details. On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 05:34:08 -0600, Gareth Western <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it possible (without modifying source code) to change the timings that the > HTTP Proxy uses when deciding which requests it puts in a group? > > The reason I ask is that

HTTP Proxy Grouping Timer

2005-03-24 Thread Gareth Western
Is it possible (without modifying source code) to change the timings that the HTTP Proxy uses when deciding which requests it puts in a group? The reason I ask is that I'm making some requests which have slower responses than others (as they contain more data), therefore they're being split into d

Re: Random distribution for thread start time

2005-03-24 Thread Gareth Western
Ah yes, if I add a Random Timer to the first HTTPRequest with a "Constant Delay Offset" of my "initialSleepTime" and a "Deviation" of 20% of this value then it has the desired effect. Great! Thanks for your help! =D Quoting sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Not directly. > > Have you tried adding a Ran

Re: thread.setEndTime(group.getDuration()*1000+(thread.getStartTime()));

2005-03-24 Thread Shabana Shabana
Can u be more precise. On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 13:47:53 +0530, Deepak Batra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It actually seems to have a negative impact too, that thread ends right > away. > > On more testing if I don't set the > > group.setScheduler(true); > > and hence don't get into the following c

Re: thread.setEndTime(group.getDuration()*1000+(thread.getStartTime()));

2005-03-24 Thread Deepak Batra
It actually seems to have a negative impact too, that thread ends right away. On more testing if I don't set the group.setScheduler(true); and hence don't get into the following code (in my NewStandardJMeterEngine that extends StandardJMeterEngine) thread.setEndTime(group.getDuration()*1000+(t

thread.setEndTime(group.getDuration()*1000+(thread.getStartTime()));

2005-03-24 Thread Deepak Batra
thread.setEndTime(group.getDuration()*1000+(thread.getStartTime())); doesn't seem to have any impact. I have a controller that sets this duration but my test just ignores this values and starts and ends right away. Can someone guide what I am doing wrong. Deepak