Re: Issues regarding analysis

2008-04-15 Thread sebb
On 16/04/2008, Vignesh Venkataraman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on JMeter for analysis on the tool and development. In the > analysis, I found few issues, > 1. Standard deviation calculated is the biased SD and not unbiased SD, why > is biased SD being calculated? It uses

Issues regarding analysis

2008-04-15 Thread Vignesh Venkataraman
Hi, I am working on JMeter for analysis on the tool and development. In the analysis, I found few issues, 1. Standard deviation calculated is the biased SD and not unbiased SD, why is biased SD being calculated? 2. In case of different pages having similar components, as they are grouped together

Re: Multiple assertions in a single response assertion page

2008-04-15 Thread sebb
On 16/04/2008, Siva Pannier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I had kept a common response assertion page to 5 different Http sampler > requests. I want to evaluate the responses from those 5 requests to > check, whether they have any of the below tags in their XML response, > > >

Multiple assertions in a single response assertion page

2008-04-15 Thread Siva Pannier
Hi All, I had kept a common response assertion page to 5 different Http sampler requests. I want to evaluate the responses from those 5 requests to check, whether they have any of the below tags in their XML response, Either S Or Success How can I implement this in a better

Re: junit sampler accepting variables

2008-04-15 Thread sebb
On 15/04/2008, John Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > > I saw on a 2006 mail that the Junit sampler can't take in variables e.g. > from user defined variables. This would be a really useful thing in order to > be able to re-use tests with different parameters. Which parameters are you

Re: loading WSDL from local disk

2008-04-15 Thread sebb
The format is: file:///D:/JMeter/bin/file.wsdl so either the file is not valid or JMeter does not accept the WSDL from local files. But the WSDL is not essential; you can add the information by hand to the sampler. On 15/04/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sebb, > Thank

Re: loading WSDL from local disk

2008-04-15 Thread mhudson1976
Sebb, Thanks for the reply, I have the file on my windows PC in D:\LROWS_edit.wsdl I have tried the following: file://D:/LROWS_edit.wsdl file://D:\LROWS_edit.wsdl file:///D:/LROWS_edit.wsdl file:///D:\LROWS_edit.wsdl and D:///LROWS_edit.wsdl D://LROWS_edit.wsdl All with the same error messag

Re: loading WSDL from local disk

2008-04-15 Thread sebb
Have you tried using a file:/// URL? On 15/04/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am using the SOAP Sampler and was wondering if there is some way to load > the WSDL file from my local hard drive if i don't have if available via a > URL?? I imagine I don't even need to use th

loading WSDL from local disk

2008-04-15 Thread mhudson1976
I am using the SOAP Sampler and was wondering if there is some way to load the WSDL file from my local hard drive if i don't have if available via a URL?? I imagine I don't even need to use this feature to create a soap request but it does make filing out some of the fields easier.? So if i can

Re: Read previously saved listener data again into JMeter

2008-04-15 Thread sebb
http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/usermanual/listeners.html#loading On 15/04/2008, Grzegorz Kończyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Agregate Graph has "Write results to file / Read from file" option. How > exactly does "Read from file" works? I made a test, saved data to *.csv file > with "

Re: Strange behavior of XML assertion

2008-04-15 Thread sebb
On 15/04/2008, Krzysieq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the end, I think it turns out to be a bug in our project's code - albeit > a very subtle one. We moved down to an earlier version, and the tests were > successful again. It is very strange that this also happens to old code on > another mac

junit sampler accepting variables

2008-04-15 Thread John Hawkins
hi, I saw on a 2006 mail that the Junit sampler can't take in variables e.g. from user defined variables. This would be a really useful thing in order to be able to re-use tests with different parameters. Has this function been put in since? cheers, John. -

RE: starting threads in consecutive loops

2008-04-15 Thread Steve Kapinos
The same thread will simply repeat the thread group 3 times. It's still the same process... Just starts at the top again when its done the plan. Its only one simultaneous instance. The # of users is where any simultaneous action takes place. 10 threads, repeat the plan 3 times each. Loops a

RE: starting threads in consecutive loops

2008-04-15 Thread Grzegorz Kończyk
>If you have 1 threadgroup with 10 threads(users) you only have 10 threads. >>Each thread will process the test plan contained in the thread group. >If your thread group contains a loop controller, executing the same loop 3 >>times.. Each thread will run through that loop 3 times. 1 process do

RE: starting threads in consecutive loops

2008-04-15 Thread Steve Kapinos
If you have 1 threadgroup with 10 threads(users) you only have 10 threads. Each thread will process the test plan contained in the thread group. If your thread group contains a loop controller, executing the same loop 3 times.. Each thread will run through that loop 3 times. 1 process doing t

RE: starting threads in consecutive loops

2008-04-15 Thread Steve Kapinos
No... Once each thread starts... It runs on its own by default. So lets say you have Thread Group Loop Controller Samplers Random Timers Depending on your loop's duration and timers... Its quite possible for Thread #1 to be on loop pass #2 while Thread #2 could be on loop pass #3

Re: starting threads in consecutive loops

2008-04-15 Thread Ronan Klyne
Grzegorz Kończyk wrote: Hmm, so what is the difference between having loops and not having them in the TestPlan? Let's see at following case: - 1 ThreadGroup - 10 threads - 3 loops So there will be 30 threads started simultaneously. So it will be the same, as: - 30 threads - 1 loop Is that r

RE: starting threads in consecutive loops

2008-04-15 Thread Grzegorz Kończyk
Hmm, so what is the difference between having loops and not having them in the TestPlan? Let's see at following case: - 1 ThreadGroup - 10 threads - 3 loops So there will be 30 threads started simultaneously. So it will be the same, as: - 30 threads - 1 loop Is that right? GK -Original

Re: starting threads in consecutive loops

2008-04-15 Thread Ronan Klyne
Grzegorz Kończyk wrote: If I have 3 loops, all threads from 1st loop have to be finished before starting 2nd loop? By default, no. They will all run simultaneously. There is a config option on the test plan to run them separately. # r -- Ronan Klyne Business Collaborator Developer Te

RE: starting threads in consecutive loops

2008-04-15 Thread Grzegorz Kończyk
Yes, I know all of that. I just want to know how does it work. If I have 3 loops, all threads from 1st loop have to be finished before starting 2nd loop? -Original Message- From: Steve Kapinos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 1:03 PM To: JMeter Users List Subject:

RE: starting threads in consecutive loops

2008-04-15 Thread Steve Kapinos
What do you want the behavior to be? All threads in a thread group will start based on the ramp up time. Ramp up time divided by # of threads = time waited between thread starts. So if you have 10 threads, and a 300 ramp up time, 300 / 10 = 30 second wait between threads starting. -Steve -

Read previously saved listener data again into JMeter

2008-04-15 Thread Grzegorz Kończyk
Hi, Agregate Graph has "Write results to file / Read from file" option. How exactly does "Read from file" works? I made a test, saved data to *.csv file with "Save Table Data" button. How can I load them again into JMeter? GK

starting threads in consecutive loops

2008-04-15 Thread Grzegorz Kończyk
If I have 10 threads and 3 loops, is there possible (i.e. by specifying specific time in random timers) that some thread from 1st loop won't finish (i.e. all threads from 1st loop are finished, but 9th not) and threads from next loop start to work? GK

Re: Strange behavior of XML assertion

2008-04-15 Thread Krzysieq
In the end, I think it turns out to be a bug in our project's code - albeit a very subtle one. We moved down to an earlier version, and the tests were successful again. It is very strange that this also happens to old code on another machine, however... How's the response saved to file different fr