That's a tough one.
I've only got one guess left: did you forget to define a thread group in the test plan?
/Keld
- Original Message -
From: "Kannan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "JMeter Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 4:45 AM
Subject: Re: http proxy server opt
t" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:05 PM
Subject: AW: New article about JMeter
> Whow! That's a great one.
>
> Thanx,
>
> Wolfram Rittmeyer
>
>
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Keld Helbig Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL
nt: 05 February, 2003 3:05 PM
Subject: AW: New article about JMeter
> Whow! That's a great one.
>
> Thanx,
>
> Wolfram Rittmeyer
>
>
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Keld Helbig Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. F
>That's really nice.
:-)
>Do you mind if I provide a link to it from Apache?
Not at all - the purpose of my writing is to have my articles read!
>One thing, about proxy recording, ...
Yes, I knew that, but you know, I have to cut some things out, and this one
was left out deliberately.
>... inc
As a supplement to the fine JMeter User's Manual I've written an article about JMeter.
It's meant as a tutorial on how you'd use JMeter in your daily work.
If you're interested then read on
http://javaboutique.internet.com/tutorials/JMeter/
Comments on the article are most welcome.
/Keld
--
Yes, I see the idea. Not a bad one.
I'll think I'll try that.
Thanx.
/Keld
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Mike
Thanx for the answer. Kinda guessed that someone saw my posting, but didn't
have a good answer ;o)
Yes, the results are stable.
I'll try logging some more and see what it says.
The dumb thing about this is that using a JMeter server ought to give you
more realistic results. As I see it no
I've posted this before, but got no responses, so I'll try once more under a new
subject :-)
I've done some experimentation with remote testing. It works fine, but I get some
results that I don't fully understand. Maybe you do?
Here's the setup:
3 identical Win2000 computers, 512Mb RAM, approx.
I've done some experimentation with remote testing. It works fine, but I get some
results that I don't fully understand. Maybe you do?
Here's the setup:
3 identical Win2000 computers, 512Mb RAM, approx. 500MHz.
JDK is 1.4 on all machines.
Number one running a Tomcat 4.1.12 with a simple servlet a
I'd love to see an explanation on how to do remote testing the 'proper
way'.
Could anyone give a step-by-step guide for newbies on how to do this?
As far as I understand it you need 3 machines - your own workstation
running the JMeter GUI, an intermediate JMeter server that sits between
your GUI a
When I run the Gui client from the latest nightly build of JMeter (1.8+) on my Win2000
orWin98 platform I see some nice icons for the elements in the Test Plan: e.g. a watch
for a timer. These icons can also be seen in a couple of articles on the web.
But when I run version 1.8 I only see two ic
ready-built
> (although totally untested) binary.
>
> Good luck,
>
> Jordi.
>
> Keld Helbig Hansen wrote:
> > I'm using JMeter 1.8 on Win2000.
> >
> > If I try to use the SOAP sampler I get:
> > java.net.ProtocolException: Can't reset method: al
I'm using JMeter 1.8 on Win2000.
If I try to use the SOAP sampler I get:
java.net.ProtocolException: Can't reset method: already connected
I've seen another user having the same problem.
I've also seen a suggestion to use the HTTPrequest Sampler and enter the
soap message as a parameter.
I can n
I'm using JMeter 1.8 on Win2000.
When I enter a filename on one of the listeners, and then later removes it,
and saves the Test Plan, the old filename is saved as part of the plan.
Here's a quick fix: when removing the filename enter (at least) a single
space in the filename field.
--
To unsubs
- ... you can probably guess the rest ...
>
> It worked last time I had to use it.
>
> Good luck,
>
> Jordi.
>
> Keld Helbig Hansen wrote:
> > I've tried it and it simply doesn't work.
> > I'm using JMeter v. 1.8.
> > I've trie
xy Server will very cleverly
> use those in lieu of the actual servername and port number.
>
> Then you can just change those values to get what you want.
>
> Salut,
>
> Jordi.
>
> Keld Helbig Hansen wrote:
> > When I record something using the HTTP Proxy Server I get
When I record something using the HTTP Proxy Server I get the servername and port
number recorded in each and every HTTP request.
Is there some way to avoid this so I can later set the servername (and port number) in
the HTTP Request Defaults?
I've heard that it should be possible by using the
17 matches
Mail list logo
