Re: Peak tests

2005-12-14 Thread Iago Toral Quiroga
El mar, 13-12-2005 a las 18:19, sebb escribió: On 13/12/05, Iago Toral Quiroga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, is there any way to get threads of different machines execute diferent requests? Yes, make sure the data files are have different data in them. That works fine. Thanks sebb!

Re: Peak tests

2005-12-13 Thread Iago Toral Quiroga
El vie, 09-12-2005 a las 18:37, sebb escribió: Not necessarily. You can use variables in the requests, and read the variables from a file using CSV Data Set. Each thread will get a different line from the file (unless it wraps round). I tried it and works fine if I execute the test

Re: Peak tests

2005-12-13 Thread Peter Lin
unfortunately, the only way to have each client machine use a test plan is to start jmeter on several systems and then have a few people help you click run at the same time. in the case where you really need each request to be different, due to caching, I would recommend turning off the cache to

Re: Peak tests

2005-12-13 Thread sebb
On 13/12/05, Iago Toral Quiroga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: El vie, 09-12-2005 a las 18:37, sebb escribió: Not necessarily. You can use variables in the requests, and read the variables from a file using CSV Data Set. Each thread will get a different line from the file (unless it wraps

Re: Peak tests

2005-12-09 Thread Peter Lin
I'm not sure I understand why you have 100 thread groups. you can put the requests in sequence in 1 threadGroup and increase the thread count to 100 with 0 second ramp up. peter On 12/9/05, Iago Toral Quiroga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi!, I'm using Jmeter to perform a peak test of my web

Re: Peak tests

2005-12-09 Thread Iago Toral Quiroga
El vie, 09-12-2005 a las 15:17, Peter Lin escribió: I'm not sure I understand why you have 100 thread groups. you can put the requests in sequence in 1 threadGroup and increase the thread count to 100 with 0 second ramp up. peter Because the requests must be different. If I do what you say,

Re: Peak tests

2005-12-09 Thread Peter Lin
for what it's worth, it's nearly impossible to get all 100 requests within 500ms. The reason for this is making the initial connection to your webserver will have a high initial cost. How many iterations are you using. if you look at all formal performance test specifications, they all have a

Re: Peak tests

2005-12-09 Thread Iago Toral Quiroga
First of all, thanks a lot for your answer peter, I comment it between lines: El vie, 09-12-2005 a las 16:00, Peter Lin escribió: for what it's worth, it's nearly impossible to get all 100 requests within 500ms. The reason for this is making the initial connection to your webserver will have a

Re: Peak tests

2005-12-09 Thread Peter Lin
your explanation helps, but here's the thing. Say I want to simulate the /. effect. If 5K people all hit /. at the same exact nanosecond, all the connections will still be queued up by the server and the webserver will process them one at a time. As soon as a server thread/precess starts to

Re: Peak tests

2005-12-09 Thread sebb
n 09/12/05, Iago Toral Quiroga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: El vie, 09-12-2005 a las 15:17, Peter Lin escribió: I'm not sure I understand why you have 100 thread groups. you can put the requests in sequence in 1 threadGroup and increase the thread count to 100 with 0 second ramp up. peter

Re: Peak tests

2005-12-09 Thread Iago Toral Quiroga
I understand what you tell me. I think the problem is a set of things: 1.- The server has to queue all the requests. Although it can have enough threads to handle all of them, only one thread can be in execution at a given time. 2.- Jmeter has the same problem when launching all the requests. 3.-

Re: Peak tests

2005-12-09 Thread Iago Toral Quiroga
El vie, 09-12-2005 a las 18:10, sebb escribió: n 09/12/05, Iago Toral Quiroga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: El vie, 09-12-2005 a las 15:17, Peter Lin escribió: I'm not sure I understand why you have 100 thread groups. you can put the requests in sequence in 1 threadGroup and increase the

Re: Peak tests

2005-12-09 Thread sebb
On 09/12/05, Iago Toral Quiroga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: El vie, 09-12-2005 a las 18:10, sebb escribió: n 09/12/05, Iago Toral Quiroga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: El vie, 09-12-2005 a las 15:17, Peter Lin escribió: I'm not sure I understand why you have 100 thread groups. you can