Re: TestBean and Objects

2006-09-15 Thread R R
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" To: "JMeter Users List" Subject: Re: TestBean and Objects Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:25:27 +0100 On 08/09/06, R R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello again! :) So this is all working very nicely now and it did not take mu

Re: TestBean and Objects

2006-09-12 Thread sebb
On 08/09/06, R R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello again! :) So this is all working very nicely now and it did not take much time at all to set-up. The only issue I have left is getting the TestBean to show a TextArea for one of the parameters. This parameter can be any XML message (which can be

Re: TestBean and Objects

2006-09-08 Thread R R
s List" To: "JMeter Users List" Subject: Re: TestBean and Objects Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 18:48:07 +0100 One way round this would be to define some utility methods in the appropriate .bshrc file. The code in the sampler could then be simplified. If you don't have too many vari

Re: TestBean and Objects

2006-09-08 Thread R R
Thanx Sebb, As always very helpful :) R From: sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" To: "JMeter Users List" Subject: Re: TestBean and Objects Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 18:48:07 +0100 One way round this would be to define some utility methods in t

Re: TestBean and Objects

2006-09-07 Thread sebb
One way round this would be to define some utility methods in the appropriate .bshrc file. The code in the sampler could then be simplified. If you don't have too many variables, these can be passed in as parameters to the BeanShell script, which could then be stored in a file. So you would just

TestBean and Objects

2006-09-07 Thread R R
Hi, We have been using Bean Shell for testing some protocols that are not part of the standard samplers. I would like to make this a little more user friendly so the developers can play around on there own without having to learn our API calls etcÂ… It looks like the easiest way to do this i