> On Thursday 28 November 2002 10:33, E.L. Willighagen wrote:
>> > I think that some of the code that is in the old Atom.java should be
>> moved out of there.
>> > For example, all the references to transform and screenPosition (and
>> screenX/Y/Z/Diameter) should be part of AtomShape, not part of
On Thursday 28 November 2002 10:33, E.L. Willighagen wrote:
> > I think that some of the code that is in the old Atom.java should be
> > moved out of there.
> > For example, all the references to transform and screenPosition (and
> > screenX/Y/Z/Diameter) should be part of AtomShape, not part of th
On Thursday 28 November 2002 10:00, Fabian Dortu wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 18:50, Miguel Howard wrote:
> > I think that some of the code that is in the old Atom.java should be
> > moved out of there.
> > For example, all the references to transform and screenPosition (and
> > screenX/Y/Z/Diame
On Wednesday 27 November 2002 18:50, Miguel Howard wrote:
> My thoughts ...
More than welcome... I appreciate any input much.
> I think that some of the code that is in the old Atom.java should be moved
> out of there.
> For example, all the references to transform and screenPosition (and
> scree
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 18:50, Miguel Howard wrote:
> Egon,
>
> My thoughts ...
>
> I think that some of the code that is in the old Atom.java should be moved
> out of there.
> For example, all the references to transform and screenPosition (and
> screenX/Y/Z/Diameter) should be part of AtomShape,
