Bugs item #1119489, was opened at 2005-02-09 13:34
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by molvisions
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=379133&aid=1119489&group_id=23629
Category: Scripting
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Rejec
On 2005-05-03 (20:24) Bob Hanson wrote:
>I think the other convention is the "x-convention" ZXZ.
>Is it safe to say that "show orientation" is going to continue
>to elicit curiosity because of the unfamiliarity of Euler angles?
>If so, perhaps a comment would help. Maybe:
>
> >>show orientation
>
I think the other convention is the "x-convention" ZXZ.
Is it safe to say that "show orientation" is going to continue
to elicit curiosity because of the unfamiliarity of Euler angles?
If so, perhaps a comment would help. Maybe:
>>show orientation
moveTo 1 -574 772 273 91.2;
OR
reset; rotate z -21.
> On 2005-05-03 (13:17) SourceForge.net wrote:
>
>>Category: Scripting
>>Group: None
>>Status: Open
>>Resolution: None
>>Priority: 5
>>Submitted By: friedar (friedar)
>>Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
>>Summary: show orientation typo
>>
>>Initial Comment:
>>Show orientation gives the z rota
On 2005-05-03 (17:55) Bob Hanson wrote:
>It's called the "y-convention of Euler Angles"
>
>Tim, you will appreciate this reference:
>http://biomachina.org/publications_web/KOVA02.pdf
>
>
>timothy driscoll wrote:
>>so out of curiosity, can I ask why it is done this way instead of
>>an xyz rotation
It's called the "y-convention of Euler Angles"
Tim, you will appreciate this reference:
http://biomachina.org/publications_web/KOVA02.pdf
timothy driscoll wrote:
so out of curiosity, can I ask why it is done this way instead of an xyz rotation (or zyx)?
--
Robert M. Hanson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 507-6
this is correct functionality. It's a (z,y,z) set. See archives.
Don't worry. It works!
SourceForge.net wrote:
Bugs item #1119489, was opened at 2005-02-09 18:34
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by friedar
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&a
Bugs item #1171305, was opened at 2005-03-27 03:58
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by molvisions
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=379133&aid=1171305&group_id=23629
>Category: User interface
Group: HEAD
>Status: Closed
>Resolution:
>> I forgot a thing with this file: the pathnames inside it (the "name" part
>> of
>> the properties) are full pathnames so currently they match my own
>> installation (E:\Java\Jmol-web\).
>
>Ohh ... full pathnames ... that is unfortunate.
>
>> So, for the moment, it is not very helpful to hav
Bugs item #1119489, was opened at 2005-02-09 18:34
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by friedar
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=379133&aid=1119489&group_id=23629
Category: Scripting
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority:
On 2005-05-03 (13:17) SourceForge.net wrote:
>Category: Scripting
>Group: None
>Status: Open
>Resolution: None
>Priority: 5
>Submitted By: friedar (friedar)
>Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
>Summary: show orientation typo
>
>Initial Comment:
>Show orientation gives the z rotation spec twice
Bugs item #1119489, was opened at 2005-02-09 13:34
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by molvisions
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=379133&aid=1119489&group_id=23629
>Category: Scripting
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priori
Bugs item #1192479, was opened at 2005-04-29 11:19
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by molvisions
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=379133&aid=1192479&group_id=23629
Category: Scripting
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
P
[also copied to openbabel, jmol and CDK - please be careful in replying]
At 13:15 03/05/2005, Miguel wrote:
>
> (1) the hack that I have done may not be optimal. The idea is that the
> Molpro xml is a superset of CML, so it makes sense to use the CML parser
> in Jmol for those bits. Perhaps I did i
On Tuesday 03 May 2005 02:15 pm, Miguel wrote:
> > (1) the hack that I have done may not be optimal. The idea is that the
> > Molpro xml is a superset of CML,
What do you mean with super set? Is it using CMLComp with some extra element?
Are you using namespaces to integrate the XMLs?
> > so it m
> Hi, I have done a little hack on the Jmol adapter code that will allow
> the reading of Molpro (http://www.molpro.net) output. I hope you are
> interested in it.
We certainly are interested in it.
I had no difficulties applying the patch and opening the sample file that
you provided.
> Please
16 matches
Mail list logo
