Re: [Jmol-developers] Internationalisation using gettext (was: [Jmol-developers] Internationalisation of documentation)

2005-05-24 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 01:25 am, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Please have a look and tell me your opinion. TODO-notes are at the > beginning of the file. Ok, Daniel and I got things worked out in CVS. The new build-i18n.xml does the gettext extraction, po update stuff etc, and creates Messages_LANG.c

Re: [Jmol-developers] Internationalisation using gettext (was: [Jmol-developers] Internationalisation of documentation)

2005-05-24 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 12:41 pm, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > I've now created the Jmol.filelist with: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers Could you come online? I'm getting close base on your work... Egon --- This SF.N

Re: [Jmol-developers] Internationalisation using gettext (was: [Jmol-developers] Internationalisation of documentation)

2005-05-24 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Dienstag, den 24.05.2005, 12:21 +0200 schrieb Egon Willighagen: > On Tuesday 24 May 2005 01:25 am, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > Am Montag, den 23.05.2005, 20:18 +0200 schrieb Egon Willighagen: > > > On Monday 23 May 2005 19:07, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > > > Yes, this works nice. Then I can change f

Re: [Jmol-developers] Internationalisation using gettext (was: [Jmol-developers] Internationalisation of documentation)

2005-05-24 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 01:25 am, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Montag, den 23.05.2005, 20:18 +0200 schrieb Egon Willighagen: > > On Monday 23 May 2005 19:07, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > > Yes, this works nice. Then I can change from to and I > > > don't have problems with existing targets. Really than

Re: [Jmol-developers] Internationalisation using gettext

2005-05-24 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Dienstag, den 24.05.2005, 01:25 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert: > Am Montag, den 23.05.2005, 20:18 +0200 schrieb Egon Willighagen: > > On Monday 23 May 2005 19:07, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > > Yes, this works nice. Then I can change from to and I > > > don't have problems with existing targets. R