> 1) changing to the signed applet allows me to load the structure file,
> but I keep getting the PrivilegedActionException when I do the
> isosurface comand.
>
> 2) putting the structure and the isosurfaces in a sub directory in
> where the applet resides allows me to load the structure (using sig
Sorry to do this to you all, but I think I found the problem. It looks
like Safari was messing things up with caching or something like that.
Emptying the cache and restarting Safari made that the signed applet
worked properly.
So now I change my initialization to:
jmolInitialize("../../Jmol"
Tim,
thanks for the feedback.
I decided to keep this on this list because of my following observation:
1) changing to the signed applet allows me to load the structure file,
but I keep getting the PrivilegedActionException when I do the
isosurface comand.
2) putting the structure and the is
Hi,
You can check the Jmol wiki:
http://wiki.jmol.org/JmolAppletDeploymentLocal
I was wondering whether it is possible to have the Jmol applet work
when using the web browser to access local files, i.e., a url like
file:///Users/rkanters/Documents/CMoR/www/aohyb_jmol/atom/index.htm
brow
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering whether it is possible to have the Jmol applet work
> when using the web browser to access local files, i.e., a url like
> file:///Users/rkanters/Documents/CMoR/www/aohyb_jmol/atom/index.htm
>
> I keep getting no molecules, and when I try to load an isosurface, I
> get:
>
Tim wrote:
> I trust you, Egon, to be sure. :-) and I don't mean to beat a dead
> horse. but section 6 of the Jmol licence says, in part:
It says that you must do *one* of these things ...
> c) Accompany the work with a written offer, valid for at
> least three years, to give the same user the
>>Note that I was not able to run this on my linux box ... out of memory.
>>I am able to run it on my Win32 box.
>>
>>The JVMs have *approximately* the same about of memory available on all
>>platforms, so it seems that this file is right at the limit.
>>
>>Therefore, I suggest you be careful when
On 8/30/05 (10:06 ) Egon Willighagen wrote:
>On Tuesday 30 August 2005 21:55, timothy driscoll wrote:
>>On 8/30/05 (9:23 ) Egon Willighagen wrote:
>>>I'm quite positive that pointing to Jmol-HEAD CVS is just fine.
>>
>>I trust you, Egon, to be sure. :-) and I don't mean to beat a dead
>>horse. b
On 8/30/05 (3:55 ) René Kanters wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I was wondering whether it is possible to have the Jmol applet work
>when using the web browser to access local files, i.e., a url like
>file:///Users/rkanters/Documents/CMoR/www/aohyb_jmol/atom/index.htm
>
>I keep getting no molecules, and when I try
On Tuesday 30 August 2005 21:55, timothy driscoll wrote:
> On 8/30/05 (9:23 ) Egon Willighagen wrote:
> >I'm quite positive that pointing to Jmol-HEAD CVS is just fine.
>
> I trust you, Egon, to be sure. :-) and I don't mean to beat a dead horse.
> but section 6 of the Jmol licence says, in part
On 8/30/05 (9:35 ) Daniel Leidert wrote:
>Am Dienstag, den 30.08.2005, 15:16 -0400 schrieb timothy driscoll:
>
>[..]
>>the complete Jmol-HEAD is, after clean, about 90 mb.
>[..]
>
>A general advice: Remove the samples directory. This directory is
>about 50 MB and contains test-files of several MIM
Hi,
I was wondering whether it is possible to have the Jmol applet work
when using the web browser to access local files, i.e., a url like
file:///Users/rkanters/Documents/CMoR/www/aohyb_jmol/atom/index.htm
I keep getting no molecules, and when I try to load an isosurface, I
get:
java.securi
On 8/30/05 (9:23 ) Egon Willighagen wrote:
>On Tuesday 30 August 2005 21:16, timothy driscoll wrote:
>>I am getting ready to distribute an application that uses Jmol. as
>>per the licence, I am including the source code.
>
>I don't think your binaries need to include the source code; you
>*are*
Am Dienstag, den 30.08.2005, 15:16 -0400 schrieb timothy driscoll:
[..]
> the complete Jmol-HEAD is, after clean, about 90 mb.
[..]
A general advice: Remove the samples directory. This directory is about
50 MB and contains test-files of several MIME types. These files should
never be distributed.
On Tuesday 30 August 2005 21:16, timothy driscoll wrote:
> I am getting ready to distribute an application that uses Jmol. as per the
> licence, I am including the source code.
I don't think your binaries need to include the source code; you *are*
required to clearly state where the source code
hi all,
I am getting ready to distribute an application that uses Jmol. as per the
licence, I am including the source code. but... what exactly constitutes the
"source code"? the complete Jmol-HEAD is, after clean, about 90 mb. do I need
to distribute the entire dir? (this is purely in the i
16 matches
Mail list logo
