Re: [Jmol-developers] Jmol license -> going to LGPL v3 ?

Egon Willighagen a écrit : > On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Nicolas Vervelle > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Apart from simply being up to date, I think the main advantage is that the >> new LGPL is compatible with more other licenses (Apache license for >> example). http://www.gnu.org/licen

Re: [Jmol-developers] Jmol license -> going to LGPL v3 ?

Am Sonntag, den 02.03.2008, 12:09 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Vervelle: > Egon Willighagen a écrit : > > On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Nicolas Vervelle > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Should we move to the new version of the GNU LGPL (v3) instead of the > > > current one (v2.1) ? > > >

Re: [Jmol-developers] Jmol license -> going to LGPL v3 ?

On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Nicolas Vervelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Apart from simply being up to date, I think the main advantage is that the > new LGPL is compatible with more other licenses (Apache license for > example). http://www.gnu.org/licenses/quick-guide-gplv3.html > That will

Re: [Jmol-developers] Jmol license -> going to LGPL v3 ?

Egon Willighagen a écrit : On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Nicolas Vervelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Should we move to the new version of the GNU LGPL (v3) instead of the current one (v2.1) ? What advantages do you see? Apart from simply being up to date, I think

Re: [Jmol-developers] Jmol license -> going to LGPL v3 ?

On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Nicolas Vervelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should we move to the new version of the GNU LGPL (v3) instead of the > current one (v2.1) ? What advantages do you see? Egon -- http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ --