All fixed. Ready for release.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
> Yes, I was wondering if there was a purpose on removing/adding elements one
> at a time.
> Collections have built-in methods to add all the elements (or some
> elements) of an other collection.
>
> Nico
>
> On
Yes, I was wondering if there was a purpose on removing/adding elements one
at a time.
Collections have built-in methods to add all the elements (or some elements)
of an other collection.
Nico
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Robert Hanson wrote:
> It's easier just to not use an iterator -- get
It's easier just to not use an iterator -- get the keys as an array and run
through them. I'll work on it tonight.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> I have just looked into the code involved, and I believe it's not a
> multithread problem.
> It's simply that
Yes, that would do it -- I hit that somewhere else as well. Continue on
jmol-developers list.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> I have just looked into the code involved, and I believe it's not a
> multithread problem.
> It's simply that we're iterating over
