Re: [Jmol-developers] JMol + Naga

2012-12-31 Thread Susi Lehtola
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:12:09 -0600 Robert Hanson wrote: > It is just used for the MolecularPlayground -- not part of the Jmol > app proper. Great. So is there a way to build just the app without having to deal with naga? -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org

Re: [Jmol-developers] JMol + Naga

2012-12-31 Thread Robert Hanson
It is just used for the MolecularPlayground -- not part of the Jmol app proper. On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Nicolas Vervelle wrote: > No idea... I don't even know what we are using Naga for (I don't see it in > the project). > But it's probably not very difficult to go up one release. > >

Re: [Jmol-developers] JMol + Naga

2012-12-31 Thread Robert Hanson
done. On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Susi Lehtola < jussileht...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm the Fedora maintainer of the jmol package. It's been quite a while > since I last updated the package (12.0.48 from August 2011). However, > updating to 12.2 or 13.0 is problematic, since

Re: [Jmol-developers] JMol + Naga

2012-12-31 Thread Nicolas Vervelle
No idea... I don't even know what we are using Naga for (I don't see it in the project). But it's probably not very difficult to go up one release. Nico On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Robert Hanson wrote: > I'm sure we can. Nico, is this something you are familiar with? Is it a > simple oper

Re: [Jmol-developers] JMol + Naga

2012-12-31 Thread Robert Hanson
I'm sure we can. Nico, is this something you are familiar with? Is it a simple operation? On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Susi Lehtola < jussileht...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm the Fedora maintainer of the jmol package. It's been quite a while > since I last updated the package (