Re: [Jmol-developers] Issues in Jmol documentation and somequestions

2005-02-10 Thread Daniel Leidert
Nicolas wrote: > >> When the bugs will be fixed, maybe I will convert the French > translation to > >> use xml2po. > > > >Ok, how do I start a new translation? [..] > - using xml2po : Daniel could answer this question better than me on > how to setup the environment for using xml2po. I'm also

Re: [Jmol-developers] Issues in Jmol documentation and somequestions

2005-02-10 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Donnerstag, den 10.02.2005, 11:12 +0100 schrieb Egon Willighagen: > On Thursday 10 February 2005 11:51 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > - using xml2po : Daniel could answer this question better than me > > on how to setup the environment for using xml2po. I'm also very > > interested. > > Sorry

Re: [Jmol-developers] Issues in Jmol documentation and somequestions

2005-02-10 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Thursday 10 February 2005 11:51 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > - using xml2po : Daniel could answer this question better than me > on how to setup the environment for using xml2po. I'm also very > interested. Sorry, should have been more clear on this... yes, with xml2po was what I had in mind

Re: [Jmol-developers] Issues in Jmol documentation and somequestions

2005-02-10 Thread nvervell
De: Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> When the bugs will be fixed, maybe I will convert the French translation to >> use xml2po. > >Ok, how do I start a new translation? It depends if you want to use xml2po or translate directly the xml file :   - directly from xml : just copy the xml fil

Re: [Jmol-developers] Issues in Jmol documentation and somequestions

2005-02-10 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 06:53 pm, Nicolas Vervelle wrote: > From: "Daniel Leidert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Do we get those nice fuzzy qualifications in the .po > > > stuff then? > > > > We get this fuzzy stuff. But I observe a buggy behaviour (xml2po does > > not add the po-Headers to the o

Re: [Jmol-developers] Issues in Jmol documentation and somequestions

2005-02-10 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 09:08 pm, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > I don't know why the archive is here in the first place, it was here > > before I came to this project. > > But since it was here it was easier to point to the local dtd for > > maintenance purpose. > > For example, I just replaced t

Re: [Jmol-developers] Issues in Jmol documentation and somequestions

2005-02-09 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Mittwoch, den 09.02.2005, 20:43 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Vervelle: > From: "Daniel Leidert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [..] > > > Egon (I think) and I decided to make this change the other way a few weeks > > > ago so that updating docbook-xml-x.y.zip in the doc folder won't need to > > > modify each xml

Re: [Jmol-developers] Issues in Jmol documentation and somequestions

2005-02-09 Thread Nicolas Vervelle
From: "Daniel Leidert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > You have replaced "../../build/docbook-xml/docbookx.dtd" by > > "http://docbook.org/xml/4.3/docbookx.dtd";. > > Is it necessary ? > > I need it to validate the xml. Because, if xmllint can't find the DTD, > it cannot validate it, so I always use the d

Re: [Jmol-developers] Issues in Jmol documentation and somequestions

2005-02-09 Thread Nicolas Vervelle
From: "Daniel Leidert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Do we get those nice fuzzy qualifications in the .po > > stuff then? > > We get this fuzzy stuff. But I observe a buggy behaviour (xml2po does > not add the po-Headers to the output file). I will contact the > maintainer for fixing this. At the moment