Hi developers,
since a week (starting on July 17 2015) I have problems connecting to
the SVN server for mirroring the scripting documentation with the
following error message:
-
svn: E175002: Unable to connect to a repository at URL
'https://svn.code.sf.net/p/jmol/code/
Hi,
Yes, sourceforge had a big crash last week, that requires restoring
everything from backup...
I checked in at the beginning of the week, and they were still trying to
restore all services.
I don't know what's the current status, they should have posted something
on their website.
Nico
On Fri
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:26:06AM +0200, Rolf Huehne wrote:
> since a week (starting on July 17 2015) I have problems connecting to
> the SVN server for mirroring the scripting documentation with the
> following error message:
>
> -
> svn: E175002: Unable to connect
SVN access should have been restored this weekend by sourceforge.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Michael Banck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:26:06AM +0200, Rolf Huehne wrote:
> > since a week (starting on July 17 2015) I have problems connecting to
> > the SVN server for mirror
On 07/27/2015 01:02 PM, Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
> SVN access should have been restored this weekend by sourceforge.
>
Yes, thank you for the hint. The svn update worked today.
Regards,
Rolf
--
Rolf Huehne
Postdoc
Leibniz Institute for Age Research - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI)
Beutenbergstra
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:02:17PM +0200, Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
> SVN access should have been restored this weekend by sourceforge.
I heard some project lost a couple of SVN revisions because the backup
did not contain the latest state of affairs.
Just as a word of warning.
Michael
-
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:02:17PM +0200, Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
> > SVN access should have been restored this weekend by sourceforge.
>
> I heard some project lost a couple of SVN revisions because the backup
> did not contain the latest s
Perhaps time to move to GitHub? (not sure about the limitations)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015, 13:24 Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:02:17PM +0200, Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
>> > SVN access should have been restored this wee
I'd strongly support a move to github. It is so much better in so many
ways...
Andreas
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Herman Bergwerf
wrote:
> Perhaps time to move to GitHub? (not sure about the limitations)
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015, 13:24 Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015
I'd strongly support a move to github. It is so much better in so many
ways...
Andreas
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Herman Bergwerf
wrote:
> Perhaps time to move to GitHub? (not sure about the limitations)
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015, 13:24 Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015
I support this idea in principle; I just started using Git on another
project (Jalview), and I certainly see the advantages. No system is immune
to failure, but it is true that the local repository aspect of Git does
mean there cannot be a catastrophic failure that impacts us for weeks the
way we j
11 matches
Mail list logo
