Re: [Jmol-users] [Fwd: SpartanModel: An Electronic Model Kit is now AVAILABLE!]

2005-05-04 Thread Egon Willighagen
Hi Warran, thanx for this discussion start on open source chemoinformatics. I printed your article in Drug Discovery Today (feb 2005) yesterday, but have not read it yet... On Thursday 5 May 2005 07:00, Warren DeLano wrote: > > Look! Jmol is mentioned in this ad. (As if Jmol were competing!) >

Re: [Jmol-users] [Fwd: SpartanModel: An Electronic Model Kit is now AVAILABLE!]

2005-05-04 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Thursday 5 May 2005 03:17, Bob Hanson wrote: > Look! Jmol is mentioned in this ad. (As if Jmol were competing!) > > http://www.wavefun.com/products/windows/SpartanModel/SpModelOrgInst.pdf > > (next to last page) And the second page too. > I'm not understanding the reference exactly, but it's n

RE: [Jmol-users] [Fwd: SpartanModel: An Electronic Model Kit is now AVAILABLE!]

2005-05-04 Thread Warren DeLano
> Look! Jmol is mentioned in this ad. (As if Jmol were competing!) Of course Jmol competes, but not for money. It competes for attention and for usage as a molecular visualization / communications tool in the educational market. With one foot rooted in open-source and the other in a software bus

[Jmol-users] [Fwd: SpartanModel: An Electronic Model Kit is now AVAILABLE!]

2005-05-04 Thread Bob Hanson
Look! Jmol is mentioned in this ad. (As if Jmol were competing!) http://www.wavefun.com/products/windows/SpartanModel/SpModelOrgInst.pdf (next to last page) I'm not understanding the reference exactly, but it's nice to see the mention anyway, I think. Bob Hanson Original Message

[Jmol-users] Tiger, Jmol, and Java

2005-05-04 Thread Philip Bays
Just to answer the question that I posed last week. I have installed a minimal configuration of Tiger on a blank partition on my drive at home. Jmol works with both java 1.4.2 and java 5.0 -- with the same problems that we previously explored in safari. Have not looked at other browsers. Phil