Re: [Jmol-users] bond displays in different Jmol versions?

2006-01-31 Thread Frieda Reichsman
On Jan 31, 2006, at 6:52 PM, Miguel wrote: My main concern is that I wish to show the fully bonded lattice, and I would appreciate any suggestions or help that people have. I do not understand what you are asking. Hi Miguel, I wanted to show the lattice with bonds from calcium to carbon.

Re: [Jmol-users] bond displays in different Jmol versions?

2006-01-31 Thread Frieda Reichsman
On Jan 31, 2006, at 7:51 PM, Bob Hanson wrote: Try load caco3.xyz select (calcium) connect 2.5 (oxygen) :) Bob Wow, Bob! works like a charm. Thanks for spelling it out! Frieda Miguel wrote: Hi all, If you visit the following page and click on "visualize the structure" (the fourth bul

Re: [Jmol-users] bond displays in different Jmol versions?

2006-01-31 Thread Bob Hanson
Try load caco3.xyz select (calcium) connect 2.5 (oxygen) :) Bob Miguel wrote: Hi all, If you visit the following page and click on "visualize the structure" (the fourth bullet), you'll see a Jmol applet pop out and the lattice structure of CaCO3 (calcium carbonate crystal) with all atoms sh

Re: [Jmol-users] bond displays in different Jmol versions?

2006-01-31 Thread Miguel
> On Jan 31, 2006, at 6:38 PM, Frieda Reichsman wrote: > >> >> However, downloading the xyz file and opening it in Jmol.app, the >> calcium atoms are not bound to any other atoms. > > I should have said that I was opening it using Jmol 10.00.46. I had > not kept up with the list and now see 10.00

Re: [Jmol-users] bond displays in different Jmol versions?

2006-01-31 Thread Miguel
> Hi all, > > If you visit the following page and click on "visualize the > structure" (the fourth bullet), you'll see a Jmol applet pop out and > the lattice structure of CaCO3 (calcium carbonate crystal) with all > atoms showing at least one bond to another atom. > > However, downloading the xyz

Re: [Jmol-users] bond displays in different Jmol versions?

2006-01-31 Thread Frieda Reichsman
On Jan 31, 2006, at 6:38 PM, Frieda Reichsman wrote:However, downloading the xyz file and opening it in Jmol.app, the calcium atoms are not bound to any other atoms.I should have said that I was opening it using Jmol 10.00.46. I had not kept up with the list and now see 10.00.47 has been released.

[Jmol-users] bond displays in different Jmol versions?

2006-01-31 Thread Frieda Reichsman
Hi all,If you visit the following page and click on "visualize the structure" (the fourth bullet), you'll see a Jmol applet pop out and the lattice structure of CaCO3 (calcium carbonate crystal) with all atoms showing at least one bond to another atom.However, downloading the xyz file and opening i

Re: [Jmol-users] v. 10.0047 zoom, positioning changed?

2006-01-31 Thread David Marcey
Thanks to Bob, Angel, and Miguel for the the explanations and suggestions! As long as there are no planned changes for centering in future releases, I think I''ll stick to the display format I'm using and edit those Jmol displays I've already created, taking this post-10.00 feature into account

Re: [Jmol-users] v. 10.0047 zoom, positioning changed?

2006-01-31 Thread Angel Herraez
The non-square applet that Bob points out was my first thought when I read David's message, but to me the applet looked pretty square --now I see in the code that this is only by chance--. Probably the problem is a combination of this together with Miguel´s comment about centering: this nucleosome

Re: [Jmol-users] v. 10.0047 zoom, positioning changed?

2006-01-31 Thread Bob Hanson
David, the real problem is that you are creating a nonsquare applet. I understand your desire -- to fit the applet to the user's browser. But instead of that, I recommend picking the smaller of your two dimensions, Math.min(frameWidth* .6,frameHeight* .99), and make that both the height and wid

Re: [Jmol-users] v. 10.0047 zoom, positioning changed?

2006-01-31 Thread Miguel
> I've noticed that this version seems to load molecules translated > approx. +130% on Z (zoomed) and translated approx. +10% (down) on Y > compared to the loads with v. 10.00. The point used for centering changed sometime after 10.00. In the 10.00 release the default center was the average point