Re: [Jmol-users] broken defined sets

2006-03-26 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Monday 27 March 2006 09:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Example: PDB entry '1DEH' > > BROKEN : define het_CLa 601:A & hetero & not water; > WORKING: define het_CLa 601 & hetero & not water; Are you using mmCIF files? If so, 10.00.49 has CIF reading code a bit in a flux... I'm in the process of

Re: [Jmol-users] broken defined sets

2006-03-26 Thread rhuehne
Quoting Miguel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Rolf wrote: The parser doesn't complain about the set names but with all self-defined sets zero atoms are selected. The predefined sets still work. Rolf, I am not able to reproduce this problem. I have defined several sets and they seem to work for me.

Re: [Jmol-users] Relative against absolute addresses

2006-03-26 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 08:20:39AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > De: Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >I raised this once before, and I may be out of date, but I'd like to > >raise it again. It seems necessasry to use relative addresses for > >jmol.js and the jmol directory in web

Re: [Jmol-users] Prerelease 10.00.49

2006-03-26 Thread rhuehne
Quoting Miguel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The loading was ok. I didn't observe any freezes (Firefox 1.07, Java 1.4.2, SuSE Linux 9.3). But it looks like all set definitions are broken. Rolf, Did sets work in 10.00.48 ? I didn't observe any problems with set definitions in 10.00.48. Regards, Rolf

Re: [Jmol-users] Relative against absolute addresses

2006-03-26 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 09:33:06PM -0500, Timothy Driscoll wrote: > On Mar 26, 2006, at 8:29 p, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > > >I raised this once before, and I may be out of date, but I'd like to > >raise it again. It seems necessasry to use relative addresses for > >jmol.js and the jmol directory

Re: [Jmol-users] Relative against absolute addresses

2006-03-26 Thread nvervell
De: Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >I raised this once before, and I may be out of date, but I'd like to >raise it again. It seems necessasry to use relative addresses for >jmol.js and the jmol directory in web pages. I can the see the principle i >here but it causes serious problems in tw

Re: [Jmol-users] Relative against absolute addresses

2006-03-26 Thread Timothy Driscoll
On Mar 26, 2006, at 8:29 p, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: I raised this once before, and I may be out of date, but I'd like to raise it again. It seems necessasry to use relative addresses for jmol.js and the jmol directory in web pages. I can the see the principle i here but it causes serious pro

[Jmol-users] Relative against absolute addresses

2006-03-26 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
I raised this once before, and I may be out of date, but I'd like to raise it again. It seems necessasry to use relative addresses for jmol.js and the jmol directory in web pages. I can the see the principle i here but it causes serious problems in two respects:- 1. When trying to incorporate jmol

[Jmol-users] broken defined sets

2006-03-26 Thread Miguel
Rolf wrote: >> The parser doesn't >> complain about the set names but with all self-defined sets zero atoms >> are selected. The predefined sets still work. Rolf, I am not able to reproduce this problem. I have defined several sets and they seem to work for me. Please try to send me a specific

[Jmol-users] broken chain specification

2006-03-26 Thread Miguel
Rolf wrote: >> Chain selection with for exammple ':A' also doesn't work any more. I have identified the source of this problem. Miguel --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends application

Re: [Jmol-users] Prerelease 10.00.49

2006-03-26 Thread Miguel
> The loading was ok. I didn't observe any freezes (Firefox 1.07, Java > 1.4.2, SuSE Linux 9.3). > But it looks like all set definitions are broken. Rolf, Did sets work in 10.00.48 ? > The parser doesn't > complain about the set names but with all self-defined sets zero atoms > are selected. The

Re: [Jmol-users] Prerelease 10.00.49

2006-03-26 Thread rhuehne
Quoting Miguel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Jmol prerelease 10.00.49 is now available for download from http://www.jmol.org/files/ This prerelease includes: * fix to stereo viewing * quite a bit of test code from Bob * MDL V3000 file support * Bob's experimentation work with polyhedra rendering * z

Re: [Jmol-users] Prerelease 10.00.49

2006-03-26 Thread Miguel
> I switched to 10.0.49 applet and I am having problems: locking of the > applet, > some scripts not executed, such as previous "set spin Y" not obeyed. > > I will be more specific when I am able to isolate the problems and give a > good description, but I wanted to announce this to see if others

Re: [Jmol-users] Prerelease 10.00.49

2006-03-26 Thread Angel Herraez
I switched to 10.0.49 applet and I am having problems: locking of the applet, some scripts not executed, such as previous "set spin Y" not obeyed. I will be more specific when I am able to isolate the problems and give a good description, but I wanted to announce this to see if others are also