Re: [Jmol-users] 11.1.36

2007-05-08 Thread Timothy Driscoll
On May 9, 2007, at 12:46 AM, Bob Hanson wrote: > Just one added feature. You can now zoomTo and moveTo a group and > designate the zoom in each case to be based on that group's radius, > not > the model's. In this way you can fill the screen with any set of atoms > you want to, and you can go to

[Jmol-users] 11.1.36

2007-05-08 Thread Bob Hanson
Nico has just released 11.1.36. Mostly this is a set of random bug fixes, some associated with the new language translations. But there is one important fix. It's actually fairly important that you NOT use 11.1.32-35 in any production web pages, because there's a bug in there that could make yo

Re: [Jmol-users] zoomTo an atom

2007-05-08 Thread Bob Hanson
checked in for Jmol 11.1.36: zoom (atom expression) 0 zoomTo timeSec (atom expression) 0 zooms to the atom expression, filling the screen (roughly) with that set of atoms. Additional options include any of the following after the zero: + x - x * x / x where x is a number. Thus: zoomTo (atom

Re: [Jmol-users] zoomTo an atom

2007-05-08 Thread Angel Herraez
On 8 May 2007 at 16:01, Bob Hanson wrote: > How about > > zoomTo (atom expression) 0 That will be a useful option! - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express an

Re: [Jmol-users] zoomTo an atom

2007-05-08 Thread Bob Hanson
How about zoomTo (atom expression) 0 Now, "0" is obviously nonsensical for a zoom setting, so this would simply indicate that we want Jmol to automatically set the zoom in the way you describe. Bob >If you take my previous example: > >jmolRadio("echo; wireframe off; restrict (80,81,82,83) AND

Re: [Jmol-users] zoomTo an atom

2007-05-08 Thread David Leader
Bob wrote: > > fyi -- All you need there is > > AND NOT (*.H???, *.?H???); > > not all the other possibilities. Blush, blush. Someone else wrote the original for me, honest. I hated it. >> >> PS Angel said that zooming automatically until the selected molecules >> fill the screen is not possib

Re: [Jmol-users] pt-br translation

2007-05-08 Thread Nicolas Vervelle
Bob Hanson wrote: > How about this: > > JmolApplet.jar > JmolApplet0.jar > JmolApplet0_Main.jar > JmolApplet0_Core.jar > > etc. and > > JmolAppletSigned.jar > JmolAppletSigned0.jar > JmolAppletSigned0_Main.jar > JmolAppletSigned0_Core.jar Good :) -

Re: [Jmol-users] pt-br translation

2007-05-08 Thread Angel Herraez
I understood Sérgio was thinking of having the underscore and "Signed" at the end, but I like Bob's idea of JmolApplet0*.jar Not only easier to select, but also to explain: "get all files whose names start by..." nice! - T

Re: [Jmol-users] pt-br translation

2007-05-08 Thread Bob Hanson
> Bob, > > I had the same problem when updating Jmol website. > What about renaming the jars as : > - JmolApplet_XXX.jar for the unsigned applet (what about > JmolApplet0.jar ? keep it or JmolApplet_0.jar) > - JmolAppletSigned_XXX.jar for the signed applet (what about > JmolAppletSigned0.jar ?)

Re: [Jmol-users] pt-br translation

2007-05-08 Thread Bob Hanson
Sérgio Ceroni da Silva wrote: > Nicolas Vervelle wrote: > >> Sérgio Ceroni da Silva wrote: >> >>> Just downloaded and tried it. Everything OK with the standalone. >>> Couldn't test the applet though (found unfamiliar jar files there!). >> >> In the last versions (recently), we changed the JmolApp

Re: [Jmol-users] pt-br translation

2007-05-08 Thread Sérgio Ceroni da Silva
Nicolas Vervelle wrote: Sérgio Ceroni da Silva wrote: Just downloaded and tried it. Everything OK with the standalone. Couldn't test the applet though (found unfamiliar jar files there!). In the last versions (recently), we changed the JmolApplet0.jar - JmolApplet6.jar splitting into a new spli

Re: [Jmol-users] pt-br translation

2007-05-08 Thread Nicolas Vervelle
Sérgio Ceroni da Silva wrote: > Just downloaded and tried it. Everything OK with the standalone. > Couldn't test the applet though (found unfamiliar jar files there!). In the last versions (recently), we changed the JmolApplet0.jar - JmolApplet6.jar splitting into a new splitting to help speed up

Re: [Jmol-users] pt-br translation

2007-05-08 Thread Sérgio Ceroni da Silva
Nicolas Vervelle wrote: > For the moment, I have taken the solution that's not modifying the > current pt translation, so I have added your translation as pt_BR. > We can change this if you think an other option is better. > I think that's just fine. Maybe the pt team resume working in the near

[Jmol-users] zoomTo an atom

2007-05-08 Thread Bob Hanson
Great. Welcome to the new world of Jmol 11, David! fyi -- All you need there is AND NOT (*.H???, *.?H???); not all the other possibilities. David Leader wrote: >David > >PS Angel said that zooming automatically until the selected molecules >fill the screen is not possible. How difficult woul

Re: [Jmol-users] Configuration

2007-05-08 Thread David Leader
I have finally resolved my problem with the 'memory effect' when using 'configuration'. The magic words were "wireframe off"! Putting these at the start of each script does the trick. So the final code for the radio buttons was of the type: jmolRadio("echo; wireframe off; restrict (80,81,82,83)

[Jmol-users] essai

2007-05-08 Thread nvervelle
- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___

Re: [Jmol-users] pt-br translation

2007-05-08 Thread Nicolas Vervelle
For the moment, I have taken the solution that's not modifying the current pt translation, so I have added your translation as pt_BR. We can change this if you think an other option is better. I am releasing 11.1.35 so that a first version with pt_BR can be tested. The current pt_BR.po files con

[Jmol-users] Thanks for the help for a beginner

2007-05-08 Thread Stephen Hillier
Hi, just a quick note to thank everyone who sent me some help to get started with Jmol. I have plenty to get me going now, and I think I'm well on the way to understanding some of the basics. thanks to you all. steve -- Please note that the views expressed in this e-mail are those of the se