Re: [Jmol-users] [Jmol-commits] SF.net SVN: jmol: [7731] trunk/Jmol/src/org/jmol/viewer/Jmol.properties

2007-05-17 Thread Bob Hanson
Thanks, Nico. #version=11.1.41 # bug fix for load with explicit spacegroup not respecting normalization choice # bug fix for symop=nijk selecting base atoms when not appropriate # bug fix for select specialposition non-functional # bug fix for adding atoms but mads[] going stale # slight redefin

Re: [Jmol-users] load append

2007-05-17 Thread Bob Hanson
Nico, I'm ready to release 11.1.41. It has important fixes for Pat Carroll and Frieda Reichsman. Pat, if you could test out the symops, that would be great. Frieda, 11.1.41 gets around the load append problem as follows: 1) Load append does clear out any secondary-structure rendering that migh

Re: [Jmol-users] slab/depth in more than one direction

2007-05-17 Thread Bob Hanson
WOW! I like it! So you got the "arbitrary internal slab" going. Good job! Bob Alan Hewat wrote: >Alan wrote: > > >>BTW, there is an example of nice javascript slider controls on >>http://www.blueshoes.org/_bsJavascript/components/slider/examples/example9.html >> >> > >I now have an examp

Re: [Jmol-users] problem with old tutorial

2007-05-17 Thread Bob Hanson
I'll bet if you move them back it will work just fine as well. Really it was a browser caching problem. When you moved the page your browser loaded the files again. That's all. Frieda Reichsman wrote: > OK, I have repaired the tutorial but am not understanding why it was > not working the way

Re: [Jmol-users] slab/depth in more than one direction

2007-05-17 Thread Alan Hewat
Alan wrote: >BTW, there is an example of nice javascript slider controls on >http://www.blueshoes.org/_bsJavascript/components/slider/examples/example9.html I now have an example double slider for internal slab display working on http://icsd.ill.fr/slabslider/ This uses the nice "Drag and Drop" j

Re: [Jmol-users] load append

2007-05-17 Thread Frieda Reichsman
On May 17, 2007, at May 17, 5:48 AM, Bob Hanson wrote: 11.1.41 will have a fix; but yes, it is true, load append deletes all secondary structure in the original file. It's possible that some day someone will figure out a way around that, but for now that is the case. OK. Just want to add

Re: [Jmol-users] load append

2007-05-17 Thread Bob Hanson
11.1.41 will have a fix; but yes, it is true, load append deletes all secondary structure in the original file. It's possible that some day someone will figure out a way around that, but for now that is the case. Bob Frieda Reichsman wrote: > Jmol 11.1.40 and I'm pretty sure 11.1.38_dev >