Alas, it's unfortunate that the wheel has to be reinvented, but as one
of my favorite authors says, "So it goes."
Having said this, I'll mention that I adopted JME as an educational tool
years ago for two main reasons: 1) It had the functionality that I
needed; 2) It was light weight.
With r
On May 13, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Robert Hanson wrote:
> Graphically, just a basic interface -- as simple as possible.
> Programmatically, as rich as possible.
OK. I am looking at the JChemPaint applet. I like the layout of the
interface. However, there are things I could do without:
Th
1. Education. I'm definitely interested in something VERY simple -- just
JME-type capability plus the option to extend as open-source ideas arise.
For me, the audience is education. JME is perfect EXCEPT that it is not open
source and never will be. MarvinSketch is beautiful, but it comes at a pric
Boy, you are an eager beaver. And on a sleep cycle much different from mine:-)
I would ask several questions about the goals of such a project:
1. What would be the audience? Primarily teaching situations or a more
general, even commercial setting?
2. How much of the periodic table do you want
Hi Bob,
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Robert Hanson wrote:
> Probably what we should do is write a simple open-source version of JME to
> provide a frame to JmolSmilesApplet. It's too bad that Peter's work is not
> extensible in that regard. Peter, you sure you don't want to do this? But it
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
