[Jmol-users] Jmol 12.1.4_dev Compare and SMILES

2010-08-09 Thread Otis Rothenberger
Bob, With 12.1.4_dev the SMILES and compare issues have been pretty much resolved: 1) A Jmol stereo SMILES submitted as input to the NIH translate site now returns a molfile identical to the submitted model - i.e. no more inversion. 2) smilesFromJmolMod1.find('SMILES',smilesFromJmolMod2) wo

Re: [Jmol-users] loading lattice vectors and fractional coordinates for periodic systems

2010-08-09 Thread Robert Hanson
Tom, the updated applet is now in http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/docs/examples-12/Jmol-12.zip You can now indicate slab and polymer unit cell information on the LOAD line, and you can also give unit cell vectors instead of a b c alpha beta gamma information. see http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/

Re: [Jmol-users] Curious Compare Issue

2010-08-09 Thread Robert Hanson
Otis, the updated applet is now in http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/docs/examples-12/Jmol-12.zip "compare" examples can be found at http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/docs/examples-12/new.htm On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Robert Hanson wrote: > Otis, it will take some getting used to and some

Re: [Jmol-users] Sharing of Jmol scripts?

2010-08-09 Thread Andreas Prlic
Hi Wayne, Can you explain a bit more how the conversion STATE->jmol script conversion works? is this tool open source? Andreas On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Wayne Decatur wrote: > Hi Andreas, > I would posit that Proteopedia makes it possible to what you suggest > presently. If you use the s

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol applications in ePlant

2010-08-09 Thread Robert Hanson
Geoff, Terrific! Be sure to add your site to the Jmol Wiki page http://wiki.jmol.org/index.php/Websites_Using_Jmol Bob Hanson On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:38 PM, wrote: > Dear Jmol users, > > In collaboration with Dr. Nicholas Provart at the University of > Toronto, I have implemented the Jmol w

Re: [Jmol-users] BUG: Parallel isosurfaces changed between RC26 and12.0.2

2010-08-09 Thread Robert Hanson
Perhaps. But really I suspect it's something different. The isosurfaces should be completely different objects -- they are initiated independently and then merged at parallel function exit. I'm headed in to where my MacBook is now. On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Charles Shubert wrote: > Hi Bo

Re: [Jmol-users] Curious Compare Issue

2010-08-09 Thread Robert Hanson
Otis, it will take some getting used to and some careful documentation, but I think you will find this SMILES/SMARTS "find" business extraordinarily useful. It is a bit tricky. On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Otis Rothenberger wrote: > Bob, > > I noticed that the return was either an array of a

Re: [Jmol-users] Curious Compare Issue

2010-08-09 Thread Otis Rothenberger
Bob, I noticed that the return was either an array of all of the atomIndexes or null. The Boolean return for the statement was "on" or "off." I picked up on the fact that the find was not associative from your original discussion of the Jmol SMILES applet. I have to admit that I've been appro

Re: [Jmol-users] BUG: Parallel isosurfaces changed between RC26 and12.0.2

2010-08-09 Thread Charles Shubert
Hi Bob, Sounds like the conference was a success. As I noted in an earlier email, I'm generating the script and I don't exactly know when a particular script will be generated, so I then to sprinkle extra "subset"s and "select"s around to make sure that I know the selection state when I send a