[Jmol-users] Let's try this one: Jmol-14.4.1_2015.12.15

2015-12-15 Thread Robert Hanson
* Download Jmol-14.4.1_2015.12.15-binary.zip (60.7 MB) * Jmol.___JmolVersion="14.4.1_2015.12.15" bug fix: Bad build for Jmol Java applet bug fix: JSmol (JSmolCore.js) check for MS Edge browser, which does not support data

Re: [Jmol-users] 14.4.0 vs 14.4.1 and Java

2015-12-15 Thread Robert Hanson
that mystery is easily solved. When I built the 14.4.1 I took a shortcut, and though it built 14.4.1, it left the property file 14.4.0, so it reported itself as 14.4.0 but was really 14.4.1, which was supposed to be no different except that one reference to setTimeout. Obviously that was a bad idea

Re: [Jmol-users] 14.4.0 vs 14.4.1 and Java

2015-12-15 Thread Eric Martz
Ah yes, I forgot to test rotation in Chrome when I went to 14.4.0. With 14.4.0 Java works but Chrome does NOT rotate. With 14.4.1 rotation was great in Chrome, but Java did not work. What puzzles me is that before your 12/13 version, rotation did not work in Chrome at http://chemapps.stolaf.ed

Re: [Jmol-users] molecule moving parts

2015-12-15 Thread Robert Hanson
You can easily move a ligand relative to to a protein using set modelkitmode true which pops up a new menu in the upper left-hand corner that does all sorts of interesting things. Maybe that is all you need. On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Daniel Barich wrote: > Hello, > > I know it is possib

Re: [Jmol-users] 14.4.0 vs 14.4.1 and Java

2015-12-15 Thread Robert Hanson
difference should be just the Chrome issue in JavaScript, but I guess I messed up. On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Eric Martz wrote: > Yesterday I put Jsmol 14.4.1_2015.12.13 into the public version of > http://FirstGlance.Jmol.Org. This enabled use of JSmol/HTML5 with Chrome. > > Today I got a

[Jmol-users] 14.4.0 vs 14.4.1 and Java

2015-12-15 Thread Eric Martz
Yesterday I put Jsmol 14.4.1_2015.12.13 into the public version of http://FirstGlance.Jmol.Org. This enabled use of JSmol/HTML5 with Chrome. Today I got around to trying Java. It does not work. In both Windows and OS X, the error message is "Application Blocked. Click for details. User has deni

[Jmol-users] molecule moving parts

2015-12-15 Thread Daniel Barich
Hello, I know it is possible to move an entire molecule in Jmol, but is it also possible to move only part of the molecule? For example, a student would like to show a protein binding to a molecule. Perhaps it would be possible by combining multiple PDB files? Thanks. -- Daniel Barich Barich

Re: [Jmol-users] Bug interacting with Privacy Badger in JSmol

2015-12-15 Thread Angel Herráez
Thanks for sharing your report, Vinushka I've added it on http://wiki.jmol.org/index.php/Compatibility -- ___ Jmol-users mailing list Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net https:/

Re: [Jmol-users] Bug interacting with Privacy Badger in JSmol

2015-12-15 Thread Angel Herráez
I can confirm that adding Pruvacy Badger to my Firefox (42.0, after a long history of auto updates) prevents JSmol from loading Tested in my own pages as well as http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/jsmol.htm Disabling the extension immediately cures the problem (on page reload, no need to qu