ps. see
https://sourceforge.net/projects/jmol/files/Jmol/Version%2014.4/Version%2014.4.4/
--
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insi
Jmol.___JmolVersion="14.5.4_2016.04.13"
bug fix: JSmol cannot load RCSB ligand files
bug fix: "axis" unintentionally made reserved word in "14.4.4_2016.03.19"
bug fix: symop(@1 @2) broken
bug fix: symop() taking default unitcell from "current" -- should be that it
REQUIRES a prefix "{xxx}
Thanks, Phil. Yes, I missed that.
http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/files/1crn.pdb
has moved, but
http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/files/ligand/hem
has not.
I will get that out later tonight.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Philip Bays wrote:
> Just on an initial superficial test with both jsmol.htm and tes
The reason I opted for /view/ instead of /download/ is that its header for
/download/ is
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
whereas with /view/ it is
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8
This makes sense, as "download" initiates in the browser exactly that -- a
download (save to file). W
no idea. You would have to send me the actual data file.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Ürmös Antal
wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I write to you, after some months effort. I would like to ask, that
> which program and which hardware configuration do you use for the
> visualisation of the surfac
Dear All,
I write to you, after some months effort. I would like to ask, that which
program and which hardware configuration do you use for the visualisation
of the surface, produced by Nascam ? We tried to visualise the surface with
Jmol (in a Core-I7 based laptop, with 8Gb DDR3 memory), but
6 matches
Mail list logo
