Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol version issue

2013-01-19 Thread Philip Bays
Otis:On my iMac using Safari, I get 15 sec for Illinois State and 4 sec for chemagic.In Firefox (18.0) it is 13 sec vs 3 sec, and I get now script warning.I went ahead and tested a couple of other browsers and they were about the same (chrome, omniweb). Opera is very slow but does display the

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol version issue

2013-01-19 Thread Robert Hanson
hah -- my reply bounced because the image was somehow still in the reply. OK, I've seen that error message before. I'm pretty sure I've fixed it, though. Sure you are using the latest files, Otis? I'm getting 3-4 seconds to mep in Firefox 18/Windows. (both sites same now) -- Robert M.

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol version issue

2013-01-19 Thread Otis Rothenberger
Bob, I think that's a note from Phil that goes back to the 15th because of his image attachment, and it predates your fix. Both sites have the same JSmol - not the same model kit right now. Phil, if you're reading this, I spent a full thirty seconds trying to click/dismiss that image before

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol version issue

2013-01-16 Thread Otis Rothenberger
Bob, Two questions: 1) The mep problem that I'm seeing consistently produces the following message on FF while it's grinding away. Does this message suggest anything to you? A script on this page may be busy, or it may have stopped responding. You can stop the script now, or you can continue

[Jmol-users] JSmol version issue

2013-01-16 Thread Greeves, Nick
...@chemagic.com Subject: Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol version issue To: jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.netmailto:jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: 5aab83e9-ef53-421d-bd50-c30028645...@chemagic.commailto:ef53-421d-bd50-c30028645...@chemagic.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Thanks Jeff, I

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol version issue

2013-01-16 Thread Otis Rothenberger
Rothenberger osrot...@chemagic.com Subject: Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol version issue To: jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: 5aab83e9-ef53-421d-bd50-c30028645...@chemagic.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Thanks Jeff, I don't get it. I'm consistently getting 40 seconds

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol version issue

2013-01-16 Thread Philip Bays
: [Jmol-users] JSmol version issue To: jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: 5aab83e9-ef53-421d-bd50-c30028645...@chemagic.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Thanks Jeff, I don't get it. I'm consistently getting 40 seconds on Safari (6.0.2) Mac 10.7.5. I wonder

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol version issue

2013-01-16 Thread Paul Pillot
...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: Message: 1 Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 22:52:47 -0500 From: Otis Rothenberger osrot...@chemagic.com Subject: Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol version issue To: jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: 5aab83e9-ef53-421d-bd50-c30028645...@chemagic.com Content-Type: text/plain

[Jmol-users] JSmol version issue

2013-01-15 Thread Otis Rothenberger
Bob, I'm noticing a power of 10 time difference in JSmol displaying MEP surfaces on two different servers. The ISU server has the most recent version of JSmol - 13.1.12_dev. The chemagic sever has an older version - 13.1.11_dev. http://chemagic.com/modelkit/

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol version issue

2013-01-15 Thread Robert Hanson
I made one significant change last night, making all numbers in Jmol doubles instead of floats. Can you test this on the same server with http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol.zip? On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Otis Rothenberger osrot...@chemagic.comwrote: Bob, I'm noticing a power of 10

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol version issue

2013-01-15 Thread Robert Hanson
one thing is that I left a debugging line in that. Might be that. On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Robert Hanson hans...@stolaf.edu wrote: I made one significant change last night, making all numbers in Jmol doubles instead of floats. Can you test this on the same server with

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol version issue

2013-01-15 Thread Otis Rothenberger
Bob, The ISU server is still really slow, including the original page load. I thought that was simply cache, so I didn't mention it before. Now I see that page load is very slow also even after the first load put's files in cache: http://chemistry.illinoisstate.edu/osrothen/modelkit/ Otis --

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol version issue

2013-01-15 Thread Robert Hanson
I'm getting 10 seconds to mep with no cached files; 5 seconds on the second page load. Probably aren't going to get better than that. (Firefox) about 20 seconds in Opera, about 15 seconds in Chime. Page is not working in MSIE due to some sort of problem with the canvas. On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol version issue

2013-01-15 Thread Otis Rothenberger
Bob, Maybe it's the fact that I'm on a Mac. For 2-butanol, I get ~30 seconds (~3 on the chemagic server with 13.1.11) on Safari. If I go to Firefox, I think its slightly faster, but I'm not sure. I get a stalled script warning. Mac issue? If there are other Mac users, would you try:

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol version issue

2013-01-15 Thread Jeff Hansen
I didn't time it, but both sites similar for me and around 10 seconds. Latest Mountain Lion and Safari 6.0.2. *** Jeff Hansen Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry DePauw University 602 S. College Ave. Greencastle, IN 46135 jhan...@depauw.edu

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol version issue

2013-01-15 Thread Otis Rothenberger
Bob, I rebooted my Mac and Fired up my Windows computer. Using my authentic 1998 Cast Holiday Celebration Mickey Mouse watch: 2-butanol second mep load MAC Safari Chrome FF ISU 40 seconds 2-butanol second mep load Windows FF ISU 15 seconds 2-butanol second mep load MAC Safari Chrome FF - 3

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol version issue

2013-01-15 Thread Otis Rothenberger
Thanks Jeff, I don't get it. I'm consistently getting 40 seconds on Safari (6.0.2) Mac 10.7.5. I wonder if I have a file corrupted in cache. Wait... I have a little portable Mac Air. It's about 15 seconds at ISU and 3 seconds for CheMagic. Another thing is that the original page load is