Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol.js -- jmolinitialize & useSignedApplet

2005-09-10 Thread Bob Hanson
Craig T Martin wrote: I actually did something like that, copying the routine to my js file and renaming it. The problem is that when that function is edited in newer versions of Jmol.js (as just happened), my routine is "out of date" and may not play well with others... right, but

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol.js -- jmolinitialize & useSignedApplet

2005-09-10 Thread Craig T Martin
On Sep 9, 2005, at 11:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Message: 2 From: "Angel Herraez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 10:05:04 +0200 Subject: Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol.js -- jmolinitialize & useSignedApplet El 8 Sep 2005 a las 14:02, Craig T Martin escrib

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol.js -- jmolinitialize & useSignedApplet

2005-09-09 Thread Angel Herraez
El 8 Sep 2005 a las 14:02, Craig T Martin escribió: > My apologies. This was MY mistake. Going against the rules, I had re- > written one of the Jmol.js routines (added two lines - see below), Craig, instead of redefining functions or adding lines to Jmol.js, you can **repeat** the function and ed

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol.js -- jmolinitialize & useSignedApplet

2005-09-08 Thread Miguel
Craig wrote: > New, but related, request: > > The reason that I had to hack a routine in Jmol.js is because I > wanted to include MessageCallBack and PickCallBack in my application. > Is it possible to add two optional parameters to the jmolApplet > function, to allow specification of these routine

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol.js -- jmolinitialize & useSignedApplet

2005-09-08 Thread Craig T Martin
Message: 2Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 17:00:57 -0400 (EDT)Subject: Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol.js  --  jmolinitialize &  useSignedAppletFrom: "Miguel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>It appears that Jmol.js can load either of the signed or unsignedapplets, as controled by jmolInitialize().1) I'm trying to use the "useS

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol.js -- jmolinitialize & useSignedApplet

2005-09-07 Thread Miguel
> It appears that Jmol.js can load either of the signed or unsigned > applets, as controled by jmolInitialize(). Correct. > The following uses jmol-10.00.35 and the latest standard issue Safari > in Tiger. > > Several issues related to this: > > 1) I'm trying to use the "useSignedApplet" featur

[Jmol-users] Jmol.js -- jmolinitialize & useSignedApplet

2005-09-07 Thread Craig T Martin
It appears that Jmol.js can load either of the signed or unsigned applets, as controled by jmolInitialize().The following uses jmol-10.00.35 and the latest standard issue Safari in Tiger.Several issues related to this:1) I'm trying to use the "useSignedApplet"  feature. If I pass "" (or nothing), t