Re: [Jmol-users] Re : Re: Jmol partial charge calculation

2012-05-12 Thread Robert Hanson
OK, I've got it. A good use for -0.0 (which is NOT exactly the same in Java as 0.0) On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Robert Hanson wrote: > how interesting! Yes, that makes sense. The only way I can think of to fix > this is to set one of the partial charges to a very small number -- 1E-10 > -

Re: [Jmol-users] Re : Re: Jmol partial charge calculation

2012-05-12 Thread Robert Hanson
how interesting! Yes, that makes sense. The only way I can think of to fix this is to set one of the partial charges to a very small number -- 1E-10 -- so that it triggers Jmol to consider partial charges as having been set. Any objection to that? Bob On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Pillot Paul

[Jmol-users] Re : Re: Jmol partial charge calculation

2012-05-11 Thread Pillot Paul
> > > > > > > > > > I've played with this new feature as well and I've found an unexpected > behavior : when the molecule is an alkane the VDW surface is not computed and > an error is issued, stating that the file does not contain partial charges to > display the MEP surface. > > >