>
> In the general case, I can think of no advantage or justification for ever
> having an absolute URL.
>
There are plenty of applications where an absolute URL are warranted. This
is one; I have given others before. Some of us work in multiserver
environments where the HTML is coming from one ma
In Jmol.js there is no special modification needed for jmolInitialize().
Please do not comment out the check, or -- if that is your intent, realize
that you don't have to. All you have to do is indicate the directory with
a SPACE prior to "http://";
Thus:
jmolInitialize(" http://kadfjadjl";)
wor
>>Q: Why does anyone need a server-absolute address.
>>
> In general a server-absolute address is needed if a page is supposed to
> work correctly also if it is saved locally on the client computer. This
> would not apply to the unsigned appled anyway. I don't know if it would
> work if the signed
Miguel wrote:
>Doc-root-relative can also be used.
>
>
Currently not. This is why I had to remove the alert from 'Jmol.js'.
>>I like the idea of an additional switch that would avoid
>>having to modify 'Jmol.js' each time it is updated, if
>>Miguel still thinks he should direct the user to the
>
>
> De: "Miguel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>> I don't know why Miguel is trying to force people to
>>> use only one of the three possible ways to provide
>>> the path (directory-relative,
>>> DocumentRoot-relative, absolute).
>>
>>I believe that I allow you to use 2 of the 3 ... not one of the 3.
>
>
De: "Miguel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> I don't know why Miguel is trying to force people to
>> use only one of the three possible ways to provide
>> the path (directory-relative,
>> DocumentRoot-relative, absolute).
>
>I believe that I allow you to use 2 of the 3 ... not one of the 3.
No, only dire
Rolf wrote:
> I don't know why Miguel is trying to force people to
> use only one of the three possible ways to provide
> the path (directory-relative,
> DocumentRoot-relative, absolute).
I believe that I allow you to use 2 of the 3 ... not one of the 3.
I am being paternalistic. I am trying to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>De: Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
1. When trying to incorporate jmol in wiki pages. One user doing this
reports that ../extensions/jmol is needed for it to work in preview and
./extensions/jmol when the article is saved (I could have these the
w
De: Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >1. When trying to incorporate jmol in wiki pages. One user doing this
>> >reports that ../extensions/jmol is needed for it to work in preview and
>> >./extensions/jmol when the article is saved (I could have these the
>> >wrong way round). An absolut
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 08:20:39AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> De: Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >I raised this once before, and I may be out of date, but I'd like to
> >raise it again. It seems necessasry to use relative addresses for
> >jmol.js and the jmol directory in web
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 09:33:06PM -0500, Timothy Driscoll wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2006, at 8:29 p, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
>
> >I raised this once before, and I may be out of date, but I'd like to
> >raise it again. It seems necessasry to use relative addresses for
> >jmol.js and the jmol directory
De: Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I raised this once before, and I may be out of date, but I'd like to
>raise it again. It seems necessasry to use relative addresses for
>jmol.js and the jmol directory in web pages. I can the see the principle i
>here but it causes serious problems in tw
On Mar 26, 2006, at 8:29 p, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
I raised this once before, and I may be out of date, but I'd like to
raise it again. It seems necessasry to use relative addresses for
jmol.js and the jmol directory in web pages. I can the see the
principle i
here but it causes serious pro
I raised this once before, and I may be out of date, but I'd like to
raise it again. It seems necessasry to use relative addresses for
jmol.js and the jmol directory in web pages. I can the see the principle i
here but it causes serious problems in two respects:-
1. When trying to incorporate jmol
14 matches
Mail list logo
