Oh, I see what you mean. Yes, I agree that needs to be clearly mentioned.
2010/5/21 Angel Herráez
> > I don't think so. There may have been CG in RasMol, but there was
> > never any capability that I know of in Jmol to detect hydrogen-bonded
> > base pairs like that.
>
> Well, certainly no detec
> I don't think so. There may have been CG in RasMol, but there was
> never any capability that I know of in Jmol to detect hydrogen-bonded
> base pairs like that.
Well, certainly no detection of base pairs. That's why I think the
distinction must be made clear. The sets are indeed defined in
fixed -- will upload shortly. Simple logic error.
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Robert Hanson wrote:
>
>
> 2010/5/21 Angel Herráez
>
> I am seeing this as a nice, recent addition in the "new.htm"
>> document:
>>
>> 122. select within(BASEPAIR)
>> # Jmol 12.0.RC5 adds the capability to select
2010/5/21 Angel Herráez
> I am seeing this as a nice, recent addition in the "new.htm"
> document:
>
> 122. select within(BASEPAIR)
> # Jmol 12.0.RC5 adds the capability to select atoms based on RNA or
> DNA base pairing. Thank you, Neena Grover! load 2qnh.pdb.gz;zoom
> 300;wireframe -0.4;display
I am seeing this as a nice, recent addition in the "new.htm"
document:
122. select within(BASEPAIR)
# Jmol 12.0.RC5 adds the capability to select atoms based on RNA or
DNA base pairing. Thank you, Neena Grover! load 2qnh.pdb.gz;zoom
300;wireframe -0.4;display rna;select *.P;label %n%r;select rn
5 matches
Mail list logo
