On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Phillip Barak
wrote:
> Would use of OpenGL improve performance of transparency of JSmol, if
> implemented?
>
>
I don't think so. OpenGL is notoriously bad for transparency.There would
almost certainly be considerable artifacts.
Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2015 12:20 PM
To: jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Jmol-users] slowness in first glance
Also, any use of translucency will significantly reduce the speed in JavaScript
Also, any use of translucency will significantly reduce the speed in
JavaScript.
--
___
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/l
On 11/20/2015 12:40 PM, GABRIEL PONS IRAZAZABAL wrote:
> Eric/Bob,
> Its a Little weird that the rotation for the same molecule with JSmol (no
> java) is excellent using proteopedia but very slow using the interface
> firstglance. Even with the popup tool and extending the molecule through the
>
Hi Gabriel
This may be the reason --not sure.
Proteopedia is using a "simplified model" approach; proteins are loaded only
with alpha carbons and ligands. That is meant to increase the speed of
loading and so start-up. not sure if it will affect rotation.
You can test: in Proteopedia, first l
Eric/Bob,
Its a Little weird that the rotation for the same molecule with JSmol (no java)
is excellent using proteopedia but very slow using the interface firstglance.
Even with the popup tool and extending the molecule through the whole screen
the rotation is excellent.
In my opinion (I am usin
6 matches
Mail list logo
